Hi Marcel,
On Thu, Oct 7, 2021 at 8:47 AM Marcel Holtmann <marcel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Luiz,
>
> >> The check to see if any tasks are left checks if bitmap array is zero
> >> rather than using the appropriate bitmap helper functions to check the
> >> bits in the array. Fix this by using bitmap_empty on the bitmap.
> >>
> >> Addresses-Coverity: (" Array compared against 0")
> >> Fixes: 912730b52552 ("Bluetooth: Fix wake up suspend_wait_q prematurely")
> >> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >> net/bluetooth/hci_request.c | 2 +-
> >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/net/bluetooth/hci_request.c b/net/bluetooth/hci_request.c
> >> index 209f4fe17237..bad3b9c895ba 100644
> >> --- a/net/bluetooth/hci_request.c
> >> +++ b/net/bluetooth/hci_request.c
> >> @@ -1108,7 +1108,7 @@ static void suspend_req_complete(struct hci_dev *hdev, u8 status, u16 opcode)
> >> clear_bit(SUSPEND_SET_ADV_FILTER, hdev->suspend_tasks);
> >>
> >> /* Wake up only if there are no tasks left */
> >> - if (!hdev->suspend_tasks)
> >> + if (!bitmap_empty(hdev->suspend_tasks, __SUSPEND_NUM_TASKS))
> >> wake_up(&hdev->suspend_wait_q);
> >> }
> >>
> >> --
> >> 2.32.0
> >
> > I was going to revert this change since it appears wake_up does
> > actually check the wake condition there is no premature wake up after
> > all.
>
> so should I take the patch "Fix wake up suspend_wait_q prematurely” completely out?
Yes, please take it out.
--
Luiz Augusto von Dentz
