Hi Peter,
> Use of zero as the size for arrays as the last element of a structure
> is a GNU C extension, which as of GCC 10 produces diagnostics when
> values in the extended array are referenced. Switch to the C99
> standard idiom for flexible array members, already in use in a few
> other headers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter A. Bigot <pab@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> No changes from previous submission except the BlueZ subject prefix
> that I hope will get this into bluez.
>
> lib/hci.h | 16 ++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/hci.h b/lib/hci.h
> index 3382b87bf..a61568bce 100644
> --- a/lib/hci.h
> +++ b/lib/hci.h
> @@ -729,7 +729,7 @@ typedef struct {
> typedef struct {
> uint8_t flt_type;
> uint8_t cond_type;
> - uint8_t condition[0];
> + uint8_t condition[];
> } __attribute__ ((packed)) set_event_flt_cp;
> #define SET_EVENT_FLT_CP_SIZE 2
does this break any API assumptions? Since as long as libbluetooth exists these headers are API.
Regards
Marcel
