On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 02:12:00AM -0700, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote: > On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 04:28:03PM +0800, Zijun Hu wrote: > > From: Tim Jiang <tjiang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > we have variant wcn6855 soc chip from different foundries, so we should > > use different nvm file with suffix to distinguish them. > > Similar question as on v4: why is it necessary to know where a chip was > manufactured? Is the hardware different? Should the FW behave differently > for some reason (e.g. regulatory differences)? Tim briefly responded in private, I'm not sure if I'm allowed to share it publicly. I still doubt whether the 'foundry' is the right way to split things, I'm more inclined towards the concept of a 'variant', which is more flexible. Anyway, I'll leave it to the maintainers, if they are happy with the foundry thing I'm fine with it.
