I see. To be honest, I didn't encounter any issues with this function.
I was trying to solve another problem and found this might be a typo.
Thanks for the explanation.
On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 6:18 AM Luiz Augusto von Dentz
<luiz.dentz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Howard,
>
> On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 4:53 AM Howard Chung <howardchung@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > From: Yun-Hao Chung <howardchung@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > If foreach_data->start < svc_start < foreach_data->end < svc_end,
> > foreach_in_range runs foreach_service_in_range to this service.
> >
> > This patch fix the above bug.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Archie Pusaka <apusaka@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >
> > src/shared/gatt-db.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/src/shared/gatt-db.c b/src/shared/gatt-db.c
> > index 8bff4d37aaa2..38d93f273a9e 100644
> > --- a/src/shared/gatt-db.c
> > +++ b/src/shared/gatt-db.c
> > @@ -1349,7 +1349,7 @@ static void foreach_in_range(void *data, void *user_data)
> >
> > if (!foreach_data->attr) {
> > if (svc_start < foreach_data->start ||
> > - svc_start > foreach_data->end)
> > + svc_end > foreach_data->end)
> > return;
>
> Actually if I recall this check is correct, we want to iterate to
> every service within the range of start to end, if the range is lets
> say 1-9 and the service is 1-14 is still within the range since it
> matches the range of 1-9, or perhaps you want to explain why that
> would be a problem since that is not explained in the patch
> description, if we do switch to strict matching it is probably worth
> documenting that we would only match if the entire range of services
> is within the range, anyway I would still keep svc_start >
> foreach_data->end since that would stop iterating early instead of
> continuing to all the list.
>
> > return foreach_service_in_range(data, user_data);
> > }
> > --
> > 2.32.0.432.gabb21c7263-goog
> >
>
>
> --
> Luiz Augusto von Dentz
