Re: [PATCH v3] Bluetooth: hci_h5: Disable the hci_suspend_notifier for btrtl devices

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Hans,

> The hci_suspend_notifier which was introduced last year, is causing
> problems for uart attached btrtl devices. These devices may loose their
> firmware and their baudrate setting over a suspend/resume.
> 
> Since we don't even know the baudrate after a suspend/resume recovering
> from this is tricky. The driver solves this by treating these devices
> the same as USB BT HCIs which drop of the bus during suspend.
> 
> Specifically the driver:
> 1. Simply unconditionally turns the device fully off during
>   system-suspend to save maximum power.
> 2. Calls device_reprobe() from a workqueue to fully re-init the device
>   from scratch on system-resume (unregistering the old HCI and
>   registering a new HCI).
> 
> This means that these devices do not benefit from the suspend / resume
> handling work done by the hci_suspend_notifier. At best this unnecessarily
> adds some time to the suspend/resume time.
> 
> But in practice this is actually causing problems:
> 
> 1. These btrtl devices seem to not like the HCI_OP_WRITE_SCAN_ENABLE(
> SCAN_DISABLED) request being send to them when entering the
> BT_SUSPEND_CONFIGURE_WAKE state. The same request send on
> BT_SUSPEND_DISCONNECT works fine, but the second one send (unnecessarily?)
> from the BT_SUSPEND_CONFIGURE_WAKE transition causes the device to hang:
> 
> [  573.497754] PM: suspend entry (s2idle)
> [  573.554615] Filesystems sync: 0.056 seconds
> [  575.837753] Bluetooth: hci0: Timed out waiting for suspend events
> [  575.837801] Bluetooth: hci0: Suspend timeout bit: 4
> [  575.837925] Bluetooth: hci0: Suspend notifier action (3) failed: -110
> 
> 2. The PM_POST_SUSPEND / BT_RUNNING transition races with the
> driver-unbinding done by the device_reprobe() work.
> If the hci_suspend_notifier wins the race it is talking to a dead
> device leading to the following errors being logged:
> 
> [  598.686060] Bluetooth: hci0: Timed out waiting for suspend events
> [  598.686124] Bluetooth: hci0: Suspend timeout bit: 5
> [  598.686237] Bluetooth: hci0: Suspend notifier action (4) failed: -110
> 
> In both cases things still work, but the suspend-notifier is causing
> these ugly errors getting logged and ut increase both the suspend- and
> the resume-time by 2 seconds.
> 
> This commit avoids these problems by disabling the hci_suspend_notifier.
> 
> Cc: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Vasily Khoruzhick <anarsoul@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Abhishek Pandit-Subedi <abhishekpandit@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Changes in v3:
> - Use hu->flags instead of hu->hdev_flags to store the
>  HCI_UART_NO_SUSPEND_NOTIFIER flag
> 
> Changes in v2:
> - Use the new HCI_QUIRK_NO_SUSPEND_NOTIFIER quirk, instead of directly
>  unregistering the notifier from hci_h5.c
> ---
> drivers/bluetooth/hci_h5.c     | 7 +++++++
> drivers/bluetooth/hci_serdev.c | 3 +++
> drivers/bluetooth/hci_uart.h   | 7 ++++---
> 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

patch has been applied to bluetooth-next tree.

Regards

Marcel




[Index of Archives]     [Bluez Devel]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Linux Wireless Personal Area Networking]     [Linux ATH6KL]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media Drivers]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Big List of Linux Books]

  Powered by Linux