Re: Bluetooth: HCI: Fix Set Extended (Scan Response) Data

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Tedd,

On Tue, Jun 8, 2021 at 12:42 PM <bluez.test.bot@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> This is automated email and please do not reply to this email!
>
> Dear submitter,
>
> Thank you for submitting the patches to the linux bluetooth mailing list.
> This is a CI test results with your patch series:
> PW Link:https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/bluetooth/list/?series=496525
>
> ---Test result---
>
> Test Summary:
> CheckPatch                    PASS      1.03 seconds
> GitLint                       PASS      0.10 seconds
> BuildKernel                   PASS      512.94 seconds
> TestRunner: Setup             PASS      336.29 seconds
> TestRunner: l2cap-tester      PASS      2.59 seconds
> TestRunner: bnep-tester       PASS      1.87 seconds
> TestRunner: mgmt-tester       FAIL      29.48 seconds
> TestRunner: rfcomm-tester     PASS      2.03 seconds
> TestRunner: sco-tester        PASS      1.99 seconds
> TestRunner: smp-tester        PASS      2.06 seconds
> TestRunner: userchan-tester   PASS      1.88 seconds
>
> Details
> ##############################
> Test: CheckPatch - PASS - 1.03 seconds
> Run checkpatch.pl script with rule in .checkpatch.conf
>
>
> ##############################
> Test: GitLint - PASS - 0.10 seconds
> Run gitlint with rule in .gitlint
>
>
> ##############################
> Test: BuildKernel - PASS - 512.94 seconds
> Build Kernel with minimal configuration supports Bluetooth
>
>
> ##############################
> Test: TestRunner: Setup - PASS - 336.29 seconds
> Setup environment for running Test Runner
>
>
> ##############################
> Test: TestRunner: l2cap-tester - PASS - 2.59 seconds
> Run test-runner with l2cap-tester
> Total: 40, Passed: 40 (100.0%), Failed: 0, Not Run: 0
>
> ##############################
> Test: TestRunner: bnep-tester - PASS - 1.87 seconds
> Run test-runner with bnep-tester
> Total: 1, Passed: 1 (100.0%), Failed: 0, Not Run: 0
>
> ##############################
> Test: TestRunner: mgmt-tester - FAIL - 29.48 seconds
> Run test-runner with mgmt-tester
> Total: 446, Passed: 415 (93.0%), Failed: 18, Not Run: 13
>
> Failed Test Cases
> Add Ext Advertising - Success 1 (Powered, Add Adv Inst) Failed       0.015 seconds
> Add Ext Advertising - Success 2 (!Powered, Add Adv Inst) Failed       0.021 seconds
> Add Ext Advertising - Success 5 (Set Adv off override) Failed       0.024 seconds
> Add Ext Advertising - Success 6 (Scan Rsp Dta, Adv ok) Failed       0.019 seconds
> Add Ext Advertising - Success 7 (Scan Rsp Dta, Scan ok)  Failed       0.016 seconds
> Add Ext Advertising - Success 9 (General Discov Flag) Failed       0.020 seconds
> Add Ext Advertising - Success 10 (Limited Discov Flag) Failed       0.017 seconds
> Add Ext Advertising - Success 11 (Managed Flags)     Failed       0.023 seconds
> Add Ext Advertising - Success 12 (TX Power Flag)     Failed       0.017 seconds
> Add Ext Advertising - Success 20 (Add Adv override)  Failed       0.018 seconds
> Add Ext Advertising - Success (Name is null)         Failed       0.015 seconds
> Add Ext Advertising - Success (Complete name)        Failed       0.024 seconds
> Add Ext Advertising - Success (Shortened name)       Failed       0.024 seconds
> Add Ext Advertising - Success (Short name)           Failed       0.018 seconds
> Add Ext Advertising - Success (Name + data)          Failed       0.023 seconds
> Add Ext Advertising - Success (Name+data+appear)     Failed       0.025 seconds
> Ext Adv MGMT - AD Data (5.0) Success                 Failed       0.022 seconds
> Ext Adv MGMT - AD Scan Response (5.0) Success        Failed       0.020 seconds

We will probably need to fix these once the patch is merged, it looks
like they are always expecting 31 bytes of data but the extended
version this is variable size.

>
> ##############################
> Test: TestRunner: rfcomm-tester - PASS - 2.03 seconds
> Run test-runner with rfcomm-tester
> Total: 9, Passed: 9 (100.0%), Failed: 0, Not Run: 0
>
> ##############################
> Test: TestRunner: sco-tester - PASS - 1.99 seconds
> Run test-runner with sco-tester
> Total: 8, Passed: 8 (100.0%), Failed: 0, Not Run: 0
>
> ##############################
> Test: TestRunner: smp-tester - PASS - 2.06 seconds
> Run test-runner with smp-tester
> Total: 8, Passed: 8 (100.0%), Failed: 0, Not Run: 0
>
> ##############################
> Test: TestRunner: userchan-tester - PASS - 1.88 seconds
> Run test-runner with userchan-tester
> Total: 3, Passed: 3 (100.0%), Failed: 0, Not Run: 0
>
>
>
> ---
> Regards,
> Linux Bluetooth
>


-- 
Luiz Augusto von Dentz



[Index of Archives]     [Bluez Devel]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Linux Wireless Personal Area Networking]     [Linux ATH6KL]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media Drivers]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Big List of Linux Books]

  Powered by Linux