On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 06:36:39AM -0700, bluez.test.bot@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > This is automated email and please do not reply to this email! > > Dear submitter, > > Thank you for submitting the patches to the linux bluetooth mailing list. > This is a CI test results with your patch series: > PW Link:https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/bluetooth/list/?series=488173 > > ---Test result--- > > Test Summary: > CheckPatch FAIL 0.77 seconds > GitLint PASS 0.12 seconds > BuildKernel PASS 529.82 seconds > TestRunner: Setup PASS 311.54 seconds > TestRunner: l2cap-tester PASS 2.46 seconds > TestRunner: bnep-tester PASS 1.76 seconds > TestRunner: mgmt-tester PASS 26.34 seconds > TestRunner: rfcomm-tester PASS 1.97 seconds > TestRunner: sco-tester PASS 1.94 seconds > TestRunner: smp-tester PASS 2.03 seconds > TestRunner: userchan-tester PASS 1.92 seconds > > Details > ############################## > Test: CheckPatch - FAIL - 0.77 seconds > Run checkpatch.pl script with rule in .checkpatch.conf > Bluetooth: fix the erroneous flush_work() order > WARNING: Invalid email format for stable: 'stable <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>', prefer 'stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx' > #26: > Cc: stable <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > WARNING: From:/Signed-off-by: email name mismatch: 'From: linma <linma@xxxxxxxxxx>' != 'Signed-off-by: Lin Ma <linma@xxxxxxxxxx>' > > total: 0 errors, 2 warnings, 0 checks, 14 lines checked > > NOTE: For some of the reported defects, checkpatch may be able to > mechanically convert to the typical style using --fix or --fix-inplace. > > "[PATCH] Bluetooth: fix the erroneous flush_work() order" has style problems, please review. > > NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report > them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS. > > Do these matter enough for me to do a v3? The first one is crazy, the second one, well, I can understand... thanks, greg k-h
