RE: Bluetooth: Add a new QCA_ROME device (0cf3:e500)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



This is automated email and please do not reply to this email!

Dear submitter,

Thank you for submitting the patches to the linux bluetooth mailing list.
This is a CI test results with your patch series:
PW Link:https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/bluetooth/list/?series=484479

---Test result---

Test Summary:
CheckPatch                    FAIL      0.49 seconds
GitLint                       PASS      0.11 seconds
BuildKernel                   PASS      562.85 seconds
TestRunner: Setup             PASS      366.25 seconds
TestRunner: l2cap-tester      PASS      2.74 seconds
TestRunner: bnep-tester       PASS      1.99 seconds
TestRunner: mgmt-tester       PASS      27.50 seconds
TestRunner: rfcomm-tester     PASS      2.17 seconds
TestRunner: sco-tester        PASS      2.15 seconds
TestRunner: smp-tester        PASS      2.25 seconds
TestRunner: userchan-tester   PASS      1.97 seconds

Details
##############################
Test: CheckPatch - FAIL - 0.49 seconds
Run checkpatch.pl script with rule in .checkpatch.conf
Bluetooth: Add a new QCA_ROME device (0cf3:e500)
ERROR: Please use git commit description style 'commit <12+ chars of sha1> ("<title line>")' - ie: 'commit fatal: bad o ("a0e33f46d8660e1fd")'
#9: 
0a03f98b98c201191e3ba15a0e33f46d8660e1fd

total: 1 errors, 0 warnings, 8 lines checked

NOTE: For some of the reported defects, checkpatch may be able to
      mechanically convert to the typical style using --fix or --fix-inplace.

"[PATCH] Bluetooth: Add a new QCA_ROME device (0cf3:e500)" has style problems, please review.

NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report
      them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS.


##############################
Test: GitLint - PASS - 0.11 seconds
Run gitlint with rule in .gitlint


##############################
Test: BuildKernel - PASS - 562.85 seconds
Build Kernel with minimal configuration supports Bluetooth


##############################
Test: TestRunner: Setup - PASS - 366.25 seconds
Setup environment for running Test Runner


##############################
Test: TestRunner: l2cap-tester - PASS - 2.74 seconds
Run test-runner with l2cap-tester
Total: 40, Passed: 40 (100.0%), Failed: 0, Not Run: 0

##############################
Test: TestRunner: bnep-tester - PASS - 1.99 seconds
Run test-runner with bnep-tester
Total: 1, Passed: 1 (100.0%), Failed: 0, Not Run: 0

##############################
Test: TestRunner: mgmt-tester - PASS - 27.50 seconds
Run test-runner with mgmt-tester
Total: 416, Passed: 403 (96.9%), Failed: 0, Not Run: 13

##############################
Test: TestRunner: rfcomm-tester - PASS - 2.17 seconds
Run test-runner with rfcomm-tester
Total: 9, Passed: 9 (100.0%), Failed: 0, Not Run: 0

##############################
Test: TestRunner: sco-tester - PASS - 2.15 seconds
Run test-runner with sco-tester
Total: 8, Passed: 8 (100.0%), Failed: 0, Not Run: 0

##############################
Test: TestRunner: smp-tester - PASS - 2.25 seconds
Run test-runner with smp-tester
Total: 8, Passed: 8 (100.0%), Failed: 0, Not Run: 0

##############################
Test: TestRunner: userchan-tester - PASS - 1.97 seconds
Run test-runner with userchan-tester
Total: 3, Passed: 3 (100.0%), Failed: 0, Not Run: 0



---
Regards,
Linux Bluetooth

Attachment: l2cap-tester.log
Description: Binary data

Attachment: bnep-tester.log
Description: Binary data

Attachment: mgmt-tester.log
Description: Binary data

Attachment: rfcomm-tester.log
Description: Binary data

Attachment: sco-tester.log
Description: Binary data

Attachment: smp-tester.log
Description: Binary data

Attachment: userchan-tester.log
Description: Binary data


[Index of Archives]     [Bluez Devel]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Linux Wireless Personal Area Networking]     [Linux ATH6KL]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media Drivers]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Big List of Linux Books]

  Powered by Linux