From: Tedd Ho-Jeong An <tedd.an@xxxxxxxxx>
This patch adds a callback routine for validating the received HCI
parameter, so it can customize to compare the parameters instead of
memcmp the full length.
---
tools/mgmt-tester.c | 8 +++++++-
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/mgmt-tester.c b/tools/mgmt-tester.c
index 1835ca079..ef37f0e03 100644
--- a/tools/mgmt-tester.c
+++ b/tools/mgmt-tester.c
@@ -280,6 +280,7 @@ struct generic_data {
uint16_t expect_alt_ev_len;
uint16_t expect_hci_command;
const void *expect_hci_param;
+ int (*expect_hci_param_check_func)(const void *param, uint16_t length);
uint8_t expect_hci_len;
const void * (*expect_hci_func)(uint8_t *len);
bool expect_pin;
@@ -6632,6 +6633,7 @@ static void command_hci_callback(uint16_t opcode, const void *param,
const struct generic_data *test = data->test_data;
const void *expect_hci_param = test->expect_hci_param;
uint8_t expect_hci_len = test->expect_hci_len;
+ int ret;
tester_print("HCI Command 0x%04x length %u", opcode, length);
@@ -6647,7 +6649,11 @@ static void command_hci_callback(uint16_t opcode, const void *param,
return;
}
- if (memcmp(param, expect_hci_param, length) != 0) {
+ if (test->expect_hci_param_check_func)
+ ret = test->expect_hci_param_check_func(param, length);
+ else
+ ret = memcmp(param, expect_hci_param, length);
+ if (ret != 0) {
tester_warn("Unexpected HCI command parameter value:");
util_hexdump('>', param, length, print_debug, "");
util_hexdump('!', expect_hci_param, length, print_debug, "");
--
2.25.1
