Hi Luiz,
>> If the Bluetooth controller supports LL privacy this command will be
>> used to test the same.
>> "sudo btmgmt power off"
>> "sudo btmgmt llprivacy on"
>> "sudo btmgmt power on"
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sathish Narasimman <sathish.narasimman@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> tools/btmgmt.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/btmgmt.c b/tools/btmgmt.c
>> index 93d244ff8ec8..4a53c3768fe9 100644
>> --- a/tools/btmgmt.c
>> +++ b/tools/btmgmt.c
>> @@ -2261,6 +2261,42 @@ static void cmd_bredr(int argc, char **argv)
>> cmd_setting(MGMT_OP_SET_BREDR, argc, argv);
>> }
>>
>> +static void ll_rpa_resoln_rsp(uint8_t status, uint16_t len, const void *param,
>> + void *user_data)
>> +{
>> + if (status != 0)
>> + error("Could not set LL RPA resolution with status 0x%02x (%s)",
>> + status, mgmt_errstr(status));
>> + else
>> + print("LL RPA Resolution successfully set");
>> +
>> + bt_shell_noninteractive_quit(EXIT_SUCCESS);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void cmd_set_ll_rpa_resoln(int argc, char **argv)
>> +{
>> + /* 15c0a148-c273-11ea-b3de-0242ac130004 */
>> + static const uint8_t rpa_resolution_uuid[16] = {
>> + 0x04, 0x00, 0x13, 0xac, 0x42, 0x02, 0xde, 0xb3,
>> + 0xea, 0x11, 0x73, 0xc2, 0x48, 0xa1, 0xc0, 0x15,
>> + };
>> + struct mgmt_cp_set_exp_feature cp;
>> + uint16_t index;
>> +
>> + memset(&cp, 0, sizeof(cp));
>> + memcpy(cp.uuid, rpa_resolution_uuid, 16);
>> +
>> + index = mgmt_index;
>> + if (index == MGMT_INDEX_NONE)
>> + index = 0;
>> +
>> + if (parse_setting(argc, argv, &cp.action) == false)
>> + return bt_shell_noninteractive_quit(EXIT_FAILURE);
>> +
>> + mgmt_send(mgmt, MGMT_OP_SET_EXP_FEATURE, index,
>> + sizeof(cp), &cp, ll_rpa_resoln_rsp, NULL, NULL);
>> +}
>> +
>> static void cmd_privacy(int argc, char **argv)
>> {
>> struct mgmt_cp_set_privacy cp;
>> @@ -5243,6 +5279,8 @@ static const struct bt_shell_menu main_menu = {
>> cmd_bredr, "Toggle BR/EDR support", },
>> { "privacy", "<on/off>",
>> cmd_privacy, "Toggle privacy support" },
>> + { "llprivacy", "<on/off>",
>> + cmd_set_ll_rpa_resoln, "Toggle LL privacy support" },
>
> Let's have it as a parameter of privacy command <on/off/ll> so when a
> user enters ll it enables link-layer privacy.
please don’t. The privacy setting means that we start using RPAs.
Also what is wrong with exp-privacy command that I already added.
Regards
Marcel
