Hi Marcel,
On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 11:08 PM Marcel Holtmann <marcel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Luiz,
>
> > This converts instances of BT_ERR and BT_DBG to bt_dev_err and
> > bt_dev_dbg which can be enabled at runtime when BT_FEATURE_DEBUG is
> > enabled.
> >
> > Note: Not all instances could be converted as some are exercised by
> > selftest.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > v2: Fix issues found by CI
> >
> > net/bluetooth/smp.c | 98 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
> > 1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/net/bluetooth/smp.c b/net/bluetooth/smp.c
> > index e03cc284161c..3cc1ad042edf 100644
> > --- a/net/bluetooth/smp.c
> > +++ b/net/bluetooth/smp.c
> > @@ -595,7 +595,7 @@ static void smp_send_cmd(struct l2cap_conn *conn, u8 code, u16 len, void *data)
> > if (!chan)
> > return;
> >
> > - BT_DBG("code 0x%2.2x", code);
> > + bt_dev_dbg(conn->hcon->hdev, "code 0x%2.2x", code);
> >
> > iv[0].iov_base = &code;
> > iv[0].iov_len = 1;
> > @@ -859,7 +859,8 @@ static int tk_request(struct l2cap_conn *conn, u8 remote_oob, u8 auth,
> > memset(smp->tk, 0, sizeof(smp->tk));
> > clear_bit(SMP_FLAG_TK_VALID, &smp->flags);
> >
> > - BT_DBG("tk_request: auth:%d lcl:%d rem:%d", auth, local_io, remote_io);
> > + bt_dev_dbg(hcon->hdev, "auth:%d lcl:%d rem:%d", auth, local_io,
> > + remote_io);
> >
> > /* If neither side wants MITM, either "just" confirm an incoming
> > * request or use just-works for outgoing ones. The JUST_CFM
> > @@ -924,7 +925,7 @@ static int tk_request(struct l2cap_conn *conn, u8 remote_oob, u8 auth,
> > get_random_bytes(&passkey, sizeof(passkey));
> > passkey %= 1000000;
> > put_unaligned_le32(passkey, smp->tk);
> > - BT_DBG("PassKey: %d", passkey);
> > + bt_dev_dbg(hcon->hdev, "PassKey: %d", passkey);
> > set_bit(SMP_FLAG_TK_VALID, &smp->flags);
> > }
> >
> > @@ -949,7 +950,7 @@ static u8 smp_confirm(struct smp_chan *smp)
> > struct smp_cmd_pairing_confirm cp;
> > int ret;
> >
> > - BT_DBG("conn %p", conn);
> > + bt_dev_dbg(conn->hcon->hdev, "conn %p", conn);
> >
> > ret = smp_c1(smp->tk, smp->prnd, smp->preq, smp->prsp,
> > conn->hcon->init_addr_type, &conn->hcon->init_addr,
> > @@ -977,7 +978,8 @@ static u8 smp_random(struct smp_chan *smp)
> > u8 confirm[16];
> > int ret;
> >
> > - BT_DBG("conn %p %s", conn, conn->hcon->out ? "master" : "slave");
> > + bt_dev_dbg(conn->hcon->hdev, "conn %p %s", conn,
> > + conn->hcon->out ? "master" : "slave");
> >
> > ret = smp_c1(smp->tk, smp->rrnd, smp->preq, smp->prsp,
> > hcon->init_addr_type, &hcon->init_addr,
> > @@ -1236,7 +1238,7 @@ static void smp_distribute_keys(struct smp_chan *smp)
> > struct hci_dev *hdev = hcon->hdev;
> > __u8 *keydist;
> >
> > - BT_DBG("conn %p", conn);
> > + bt_dev_dbg(hdev, "conn %p", conn);
> >
> > rsp = (void *) &smp->prsp[1];
> >
> > @@ -1266,7 +1268,7 @@ static void smp_distribute_keys(struct smp_chan *smp)
> > *keydist &= ~SMP_SC_NO_DIST;
> > }
> >
> > - BT_DBG("keydist 0x%x", *keydist);
> > + bt_dev_dbg(hdev, "keydist 0x%x", *keydist);
> >
> > if (*keydist & SMP_DIST_ENC_KEY) {
> > struct smp_cmd_encrypt_info enc;
> > @@ -1366,13 +1368,14 @@ static void smp_timeout(struct work_struct *work)
> > security_timer.work);
> > struct l2cap_conn *conn = smp->conn;
> >
> > - BT_DBG("conn %p", conn);
> > + bt_dev_dbg(conn->hcon->hdev, "conn %p", conn);
> >
> > hci_disconnect(conn->hcon, HCI_ERROR_REMOTE_USER_TERM);
> > }
> >
> > static struct smp_chan *smp_chan_create(struct l2cap_conn *conn)
> > {
> > + struct hci_conn *hcon = conn->hcon;
> > struct l2cap_chan *chan = conn->smp;
> > struct smp_chan *smp;
> >
> > @@ -1382,13 +1385,13 @@ static struct smp_chan *smp_chan_create(struct l2cap_conn *conn)
> >
> > smp->tfm_cmac = crypto_alloc_shash("cmac(aes)", 0, 0);
> > if (IS_ERR(smp->tfm_cmac)) {
> > - BT_ERR("Unable to create CMAC crypto context");
> > + bt_dev_err(hcon->hdev, "Unable to create CMAC crypto context");
> > goto zfree_smp;
> > }
> >
> > smp->tfm_ecdh = crypto_alloc_kpp("ecdh", 0, 0);
> > if (IS_ERR(smp->tfm_ecdh)) {
> > - BT_ERR("Unable to create ECDH crypto context");
> > + bt_dev_err(hcon->hdev, "Unable to create ECDH crypto context");
> > goto free_shash;
> > }
> >
> > @@ -1399,7 +1402,7 @@ static struct smp_chan *smp_chan_create(struct l2cap_conn *conn)
> >
> > INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&smp->security_timer, smp_timeout);
> >
> > - hci_conn_hold(conn->hcon);
> > + hci_conn_hold(hcon);
> >
> > return smp;
> >
> > @@ -1564,8 +1567,8 @@ static u8 sc_passkey_round(struct smp_chan *smp, u8 smp_op)
> > if (!hcon->out)
> > return 0;
> >
> > - BT_DBG("%s Starting passkey round %u", hdev->name,
> > - smp->passkey_round + 1);
> > + bt_dev_dbg(hdev, "%s Starting passkey round %u", hdev->name,
> > + smp->passkey_round + 1);
> >
> > SMP_ALLOW_CMD(smp, SMP_CMD_PAIRING_CONFIRM);
> >
> > @@ -1625,7 +1628,7 @@ int smp_user_confirm_reply(struct hci_conn *hcon, u16 mgmt_op, __le32 passkey)
> > u32 value;
> > int err;
> >
> > - BT_DBG("");
> > + bt_dev_dbg(conn->hcon->hdev, "");
> >
> > if (!conn)
> > return -ENOTCONN;
> > @@ -1651,7 +1654,7 @@ int smp_user_confirm_reply(struct hci_conn *hcon, u16 mgmt_op, __le32 passkey)
> > case MGMT_OP_USER_PASSKEY_REPLY:
> > value = le32_to_cpu(passkey);
> > memset(smp->tk, 0, sizeof(smp->tk));
> > - BT_DBG("PassKey: %d", value);
> > + bt_dev_dbg(conn->hcon->hdev, "PassKey: %d", value);
> > put_unaligned_le32(value, smp->tk);
> > fallthrough;
> > case MGMT_OP_USER_CONFIRM_REPLY:
> > @@ -1733,7 +1736,7 @@ static u8 smp_cmd_pairing_req(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct sk_buff *skb)
> > u8 key_size, auth, sec_level;
> > int ret;
> >
> > - BT_DBG("conn %p", conn);
> > + bt_dev_dbg(hdev, "conn %p", conn);
> >
> > if (skb->len < sizeof(*req))
> > return SMP_INVALID_PARAMS;
> > @@ -1887,7 +1890,7 @@ static u8 sc_send_public_key(struct smp_chan *smp)
> > }
> >
> > if (hci_dev_test_flag(hdev, HCI_USE_DEBUG_KEYS)) {
> > - BT_DBG("Using debug keys");
> > + bt_dev_dbg(hdev, "Using debug keys");
> > if (set_ecdh_privkey(smp->tfm_ecdh, debug_sk))
> > return SMP_UNSPECIFIED;
> > memcpy(smp->local_pk, debug_pk, 64);
> > @@ -1924,7 +1927,7 @@ static u8 smp_cmd_pairing_rsp(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct sk_buff *skb)
> > u8 key_size, auth;
> > int ret;
> >
> > - BT_DBG("conn %p", conn);
> > + bt_dev_dbg(hdev, "conn %p", conn);
> >
> > if (skb->len < sizeof(*rsp))
> > return SMP_INVALID_PARAMS;
> > @@ -2019,7 +2022,7 @@ static u8 sc_check_confirm(struct smp_chan *smp)
> > {
> > struct l2cap_conn *conn = smp->conn;
> >
> > - BT_DBG("");
> > + bt_dev_dbg(conn->hcon->hdev, "");
> >
> > if (smp->method == REQ_PASSKEY || smp->method == DSP_PASSKEY)
> > return sc_passkey_round(smp, SMP_CMD_PAIRING_CONFIRM);
> > @@ -2078,8 +2081,10 @@ static u8 smp_cmd_pairing_confirm(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct sk_buff *skb)
> > {
> > struct l2cap_chan *chan = conn->smp;
> > struct smp_chan *smp = chan->data;
> > + struct hci_conn *hcon = conn->hcon;
> > + struct hci_dev *hdev = hcon->hdev;
> >
> > - BT_DBG("conn %p %s", conn, conn->hcon->out ? "master" : "slave");
> > + bt_dev_dbg(hdev, "conn %p %s", conn, hcon->out ? "master" : "slave");
> >
> > if (skb->len < sizeof(smp->pcnf))
> > return SMP_INVALID_PARAMS;
> > @@ -2094,7 +2099,7 @@ static u8 smp_cmd_pairing_confirm(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct sk_buff *skb)
> > if (test_bit(SMP_FLAG_REMOTE_PK, &smp->flags))
> > return sc_check_confirm(smp);
> >
> > - BT_ERR("Unexpected SMP Pairing Confirm");
> > + bt_dev_err(hdev, "Unexpected SMP Pairing Confirm");
> >
> > ret = fixup_sc_false_positive(smp);
> > if (ret)
> > @@ -2125,7 +2130,7 @@ static u8 smp_cmd_pairing_random(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct sk_buff *skb)
> > u32 passkey;
> > int err;
> >
> > - BT_DBG("conn %p", conn);
> > + bt_dev_dbg(hcon->hdev, "conn %p", conn);
> >
> > if (skb->len < sizeof(smp->rrnd))
> > return SMP_INVALID_PARAMS;
> > @@ -2284,7 +2289,7 @@ static u8 smp_cmd_security_req(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct sk_buff *skb)
> > struct smp_chan *smp;
> > u8 sec_level, auth;
> >
> > - BT_DBG("conn %p", conn);
> > + bt_dev_dbg(hdev, "conn %p", conn);
> >
> > if (skb->len < sizeof(*rp))
> > return SMP_INVALID_PARAMS;
> > @@ -2347,7 +2352,8 @@ int smp_conn_security(struct hci_conn *hcon, __u8 sec_level)
> > __u8 authreq;
> > int ret;
> >
> > - BT_DBG("conn %p hcon %p level 0x%2.2x", conn, hcon, sec_level);
> > + bt_dev_dbg(hcon->hdev, "conn %p hcon %p level 0x%2.2x", conn, hcon,
> > + sec_level);
> >
> > /* This may be NULL if there's an unexpected disconnection */
> > if (!conn)
> > @@ -2483,7 +2489,7 @@ static int smp_cmd_encrypt_info(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct sk_buff *skb)
> > struct l2cap_chan *chan = conn->smp;
> > struct smp_chan *smp = chan->data;
> >
> > - BT_DBG("conn %p", conn);
> > + bt_dev_dbg(conn->hcon->hdev, "conn %p", conn);
> >
> > if (skb->len < sizeof(*rp))
> > return SMP_INVALID_PARAMS;
> > @@ -2516,7 +2522,7 @@ static int smp_cmd_master_ident(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct sk_buff *skb)
> > struct smp_ltk *ltk;
> > u8 authenticated;
> >
> > - BT_DBG("conn %p", conn);
> > + bt_dev_dbg(hdev, "conn %p", conn);
> >
> > if (skb->len < sizeof(*rp))
> > return SMP_INVALID_PARAMS;
> > @@ -2548,7 +2554,7 @@ static int smp_cmd_ident_info(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct sk_buff *skb)
> > struct l2cap_chan *chan = conn->smp;
> > struct smp_chan *smp = chan->data;
> >
> > - BT_DBG("");
> > + bt_dev_dbg(conn->hcon->hdev, "");
> >
> > if (skb->len < sizeof(*info))
> > return SMP_INVALID_PARAMS;
> > @@ -2580,7 +2586,7 @@ static int smp_cmd_ident_addr_info(struct l2cap_conn *conn,
> > struct hci_conn *hcon = conn->hcon;
> > bdaddr_t rpa;
> >
> > - BT_DBG("");
> > + bt_dev_dbg(hcon->hdev, "");
> >
> > if (skb->len < sizeof(*info))
> > return SMP_INVALID_PARAMS;
> > @@ -2647,7 +2653,7 @@ static int smp_cmd_sign_info(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct sk_buff *skb)
> > struct smp_chan *smp = chan->data;
> > struct smp_csrk *csrk;
> >
> > - BT_DBG("conn %p", conn);
> > + bt_dev_dbg(conn->hcon->hdev, "conn %p", conn);
> >
> > if (skb->len < sizeof(*rp))
> > return SMP_INVALID_PARAMS;
> > @@ -2727,7 +2733,7 @@ static int smp_cmd_public_key(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct sk_buff *skb)
> > struct smp_cmd_pairing_confirm cfm;
> > int err;
> >
> > - BT_DBG("conn %p", conn);
> > + bt_dev_dbg(hdev, "conn %p", conn);
> >
> > if (skb->len < sizeof(*key))
> > return SMP_INVALID_PARAMS;
> > @@ -2791,7 +2797,7 @@ static int smp_cmd_public_key(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct sk_buff *skb)
> >
> > smp->method = sc_select_method(smp);
> >
> > - BT_DBG("%s selected method 0x%02x", hdev->name, smp->method);
> > + bt_dev_dbg(hdev, "%s selected method 0x%02x", hdev->name, smp->method);
> >
> > /* JUST_WORKS and JUST_CFM result in an unauthenticated key */
> > if (smp->method == JUST_WORKS || smp->method == JUST_CFM)
> > @@ -2866,7 +2872,7 @@ static int smp_cmd_dhkey_check(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct sk_buff *skb)
> > u8 io_cap[3], r[16], e[16];
> > int err;
> >
> > - BT_DBG("conn %p", conn);
> > + bt_dev_dbg(hcon->hdev, "conn %p", conn);
> >
> > if (skb->len < sizeof(*check))
> > return SMP_INVALID_PARAMS;
> > @@ -2926,7 +2932,7 @@ static int smp_cmd_keypress_notify(struct l2cap_conn *conn,
> > {
> > struct smp_cmd_keypress_notify *kp = (void *) skb->data;
> >
> > - BT_DBG("value 0x%02x", kp->value);
> > + bt_dev_dbg(conn->hcon->hdev, "value 0x%02x", kp->value);
> >
> > return 0;
> > }
> > @@ -3023,7 +3029,7 @@ static int smp_sig_channel(struct l2cap_chan *chan, struct sk_buff *skb)
> > break;
> >
> > default:
> > - BT_DBG("Unknown command code 0x%2.2x", code);
> > + bt_dev_dbg(hcon->hdev, "Unknown command code 0x%2.2x", code);
> > reason = SMP_CMD_NOTSUPP;
> > goto done;
> > }
> > @@ -3048,7 +3054,7 @@ static void smp_teardown_cb(struct l2cap_chan *chan, int err)
> > {
> > struct l2cap_conn *conn = chan->conn;
> >
> > - BT_DBG("chan %p", chan);
> > + bt_dev_dbg(conn->hcon->hdev, "chan %p", chan);
> >
> > if (chan->data)
> > smp_chan_destroy(conn);
> > @@ -3065,7 +3071,7 @@ static void bredr_pairing(struct l2cap_chan *chan)
> > struct smp_cmd_pairing req;
> > struct smp_chan *smp;
> >
> > - BT_DBG("chan %p", chan);
> > + bt_dev_dbg(hdev, "chan %p", chan);
> >
> > /* Only new pairings are interesting */
> > if (!test_bit(HCI_CONN_NEW_LINK_KEY, &hcon->flags))
> > @@ -3112,7 +3118,7 @@ static void bredr_pairing(struct l2cap_chan *chan)
> >
> > set_bit(SMP_FLAG_SC, &smp->flags);
> >
> > - BT_DBG("%s starting SMP over BR/EDR", hdev->name);
> > + bt_dev_dbg(hdev, "%s starting SMP over BR/EDR", hdev->name);
> >
> > /* Prepare and send the BR/EDR SMP Pairing Request */
> > build_bredr_pairing_cmd(smp, &req, NULL);
> > @@ -3130,7 +3136,7 @@ static void smp_resume_cb(struct l2cap_chan *chan)
> > struct l2cap_conn *conn = chan->conn;
> > struct hci_conn *hcon = conn->hcon;
> >
> > - BT_DBG("chan %p", chan);
> > + bt_dev_dbg(hcon->hdev, "chan %p", chan);
> >
> > if (hcon->type == ACL_LINK) {
> > bredr_pairing(chan);
> > @@ -3153,7 +3159,7 @@ static void smp_ready_cb(struct l2cap_chan *chan)
> > struct l2cap_conn *conn = chan->conn;
> > struct hci_conn *hcon = conn->hcon;
> >
> > - BT_DBG("chan %p", chan);
> > + bt_dev_dbg(hcon->hdev, "chan %p", chan);
> >
> > /* No need to call l2cap_chan_hold() here since we already own
> > * the reference taken in smp_new_conn_cb(). This is just the
> > @@ -3171,7 +3177,7 @@ static int smp_recv_cb(struct l2cap_chan *chan, struct sk_buff *skb)
> > {
> > int err;
> >
> > - BT_DBG("chan %p", chan);
> > + bt_dev_dbg(chan->conn->hcon->hdev, "chan %p", chan);
> >
> > err = smp_sig_channel(chan, skb);
> > if (err) {
> > @@ -3223,7 +3229,7 @@ static inline struct l2cap_chan *smp_new_conn_cb(struct l2cap_chan *pchan)
> > {
> > struct l2cap_chan *chan;
> >
> > - BT_DBG("pchan %p", pchan);
> > + bt_dev_dbg(pchan->conn->hcon->hdev, "pchan %p", pchan);
> >
> > chan = l2cap_chan_create();
> > if (!chan)
> > @@ -3244,7 +3250,7 @@ static inline struct l2cap_chan *smp_new_conn_cb(struct l2cap_chan *pchan)
> > */
> > atomic_set(&chan->nesting, L2CAP_NESTING_SMP);
> >
> > - BT_DBG("created chan %p", chan);
> > + bt_dev_dbg(pchan->conn->hcon->hdev, "created chan %p", chan);
> >
> > return chan;
> > }
> > @@ -3285,14 +3291,14 @@ static struct l2cap_chan *smp_add_cid(struct hci_dev *hdev, u16 cid)
> >
> > tfm_cmac = crypto_alloc_shash("cmac(aes)", 0, 0);
> > if (IS_ERR(tfm_cmac)) {
> > - BT_ERR("Unable to create CMAC crypto context");
> > + bt_dev_err(hdev, "Unable to create CMAC crypto context");
> > kfree_sensitive(smp);
> > return ERR_CAST(tfm_cmac);
> > }
> >
> > tfm_ecdh = crypto_alloc_kpp("ecdh", 0, 0);
> > if (IS_ERR(tfm_ecdh)) {
> > - BT_ERR("Unable to create ECDH crypto context");
> > + bt_dev_err(hdev, "Unable to create ECDH crypto context");
> > crypto_free_shash(tfm_cmac);
> > kfree_sensitive(smp);
> > return ERR_CAST(tfm_ecdh);
> > @@ -3348,7 +3354,7 @@ static void smp_del_chan(struct l2cap_chan *chan)
> > {
> > struct smp_dev *smp;
> >
> > - BT_DBG("chan %p", chan);
> > + bt_dev_dbg(chan->conn->hcon->hdev, "chan %p", chan);
> >
> > smp = chan->data;
> > if (smp) {
> > @@ -3391,7 +3397,7 @@ int smp_register(struct hci_dev *hdev)
> > {
> > struct l2cap_chan *chan;
> >
> > - BT_DBG("%s", hdev->name);
> > + bt_dev_dbg(hdev, "%s", hdev->name);
>
> this is rather pointless since it just ends up printing hciX twice.
Right, I missed the fact that bt_dev_debug does exactly that, I guess
we should convert this to just bt_dev_dbg(hdev, "") or shall we remove
it entirely?
> Regards
>
> Marcel
>
--
Luiz Augusto von Dentz
