[PATCH] Bluetooth: hci_h5: Disable the hci_suspend_notifier for btrtl devices

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The hci_suspend_notifier which was introduced last year, is causing
problems for uart attached btrtl devices. These devices may loose their
firmware and their baudrate setting over a suspend/resume.

Since we don't even know the baudrate after a suspend/resume recovering
from this is tricky. The driver solves this by treating these devices
the same as USB BT HCIs which drop of the bus during suspend.

Specifically the driver:
1. Simply unconditionally turns the device fully off during
   system-suspend to save maximum power.
2. Calls device_reprobe() from a workqueue to fully re-init the device
   from scratch on system-resume (unregistering the old HCI and
   registering a new HCI).

This means that these devices do not benefit from the suspend / resume
handling work done by the hci_suspend_notifier. At best this unnecessarily
adds some time to the suspend/resume time.

But in practice this is actually causing problems:

1. These btrtl devices seem to not like the HCI_OP_WRITE_SCAN_ENABLE(
SCAN_DISABLED) request being send to them when entering the
BT_SUSPEND_CONFIGURE_WAKE state. The same request send on
BT_SUSPEND_DISCONNECT works fine, but the second one send (unnecessarily?)
from the BT_SUSPEND_CONFIGURE_WAKE transition causes the device to hang:

[  573.497754] PM: suspend entry (s2idle)
[  573.554615] Filesystems sync: 0.056 seconds
[  575.837753] Bluetooth: hci0: Timed out waiting for suspend events
[  575.837801] Bluetooth: hci0: Suspend timeout bit: 4
[  575.837925] Bluetooth: hci0: Suspend notifier action (3) failed: -110

2. The PM_POST_SUSPEND / BT_RUNNING transition races with the
driver-unbinding done by the device_reprobe() work.
If the hci_suspend_notifier wins the race it is talking to a dead
device leading to the following errors being logged:

[  598.686060] Bluetooth: hci0: Timed out waiting for suspend events
[  598.686124] Bluetooth: hci0: Suspend timeout bit: 5
[  598.686237] Bluetooth: hci0: Suspend notifier action (4) failed: -110

In both cases things still work, but the suspend-notifier is causing
these ugly errors getting logged and ut increase both the suspend- and
the resume-time by 2 seconds.

This commit works around these problems by disabling (unregistering)
the hci_suspend_notifier.

Note that any eventual hci_unregister_dev() will call
unregister_pm_notifier() a second time, this is fine it will
simply fail with -ENOENT and hci_unregister_dev() ignores the
return value.

Cc: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Vasily Khoruzhick <anarsoul@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Abhishek Pandit-Subedi <abhishekpandit@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/bluetooth/hci_h5.c | 8 ++++++++
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_h5.c b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_h5.c
index 7be16a7f653b..acbcc676d6c2 100644
--- a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_h5.c
+++ b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_h5.c
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
 #include <linux/of_device.h>
 #include <linux/serdev.h>
 #include <linux/skbuff.h>
+#include <linux/suspend.h>
 
 #include <net/bluetooth/bluetooth.h>
 #include <net/bluetooth/hci_core.h>
@@ -876,6 +877,13 @@ static int h5_btrtl_setup(struct h5 *h5)
 	bool flow_control;
 	int err;
 
+	/*
+	 * Since h5_btrtl_resume() does a device_reprobe() the suspend handling
+	 * done by the hci_suspend_notifier is not necessary; it actually causes
+	 * delays and a bunch of errors to get logged, so disable it.
+	 */
+	unregister_pm_notifier(&h5->hu->hdev->suspend_notifier);
+
 	btrtl_dev = btrtl_initialize(h5->hu->hdev, h5->id);
 	if (IS_ERR(btrtl_dev))
 		return PTR_ERR(btrtl_dev);
-- 
2.29.2




[Index of Archives]     [Bluez Devel]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Linux Wireless Personal Area Networking]     [Linux ATH6KL]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media Drivers]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Big List of Linux Books]

  Powered by Linux