Hi Marcel, 在 2020-09-26 00:08，Marcel Holtmann 写道：
Hi Rocky,This patch add support for WCN6855 i.e. patch and nvm download support.please always include the content of /sys/kernel/debug/usb/devices for this hardware.
OK.
It works with old HW by shift the offset byte in qca_devices_table, from 18 to 16. So for old HW only rom_version_low is being used and it still points to the correctSigned-off-by: Rocky Liao <rjliao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c | 66 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 53 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c b/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c index 9f294b941943..e888e4c02d69 100644 --- a/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c +++ b/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c @@ -59,6 +59,7 @@ static struct usb_driver btusb_driver; #define BTUSB_MEDIATEK 0x200000 #define BTUSB_WIDEBAND_SPEECH 0x400000 #define BTUSB_VALID_LE_STATES 0x800000 +#define BTUSB_QCA_WCN6855 0x1000000 static const struct usb_device_id btusb_table[] = { /* Generic Bluetooth USB device */@@ -291,6 +292,10 @@ static const struct usb_device_id blacklist_table[] = {{ USB_DEVICE(0x13d3, 0x3501), .driver_info = BTUSB_QCA_ROME | BTUSB_WIDEBAND_SPEECH }, + /* QCA WCN6855 chipset */ + { USB_DEVICE(0x0cf3, 0xe600), .driver_info = BTUSB_QCA_WCN6855 | + BTUSB_WIDEBAND_SPEECH }, + /* Broadcom BCM2035 */ { USB_DEVICE(0x0a5c, 0x2009), .driver_info = BTUSB_BCM92035 }, { USB_DEVICE(0x0a5c, 0x200a), .driver_info = BTUSB_WRONG_SCO_MTU },@@ -3409,6 +3414,27 @@ static int btusb_set_bdaddr_ath3012(struct hci_dev *hdev,return 0; } +static int btusb_set_bdaddr_wcn6855(struct hci_dev *hdev, + const bdaddr_t *bdaddr) +{ + struct sk_buff *skb; + u8 buf[6]; + long ret; + + memcpy(buf, bdaddr, sizeof(bdaddr_t)); + + skb = __hci_cmd_sync_ev(hdev, 0xfc14, sizeof(buf), buf, + HCI_EV_CMD_COMPLETE, HCI_INIT_TIMEOUT); + if (IS_ERR(skb)) { + ret = PTR_ERR(skb); + bt_dev_err(hdev, "Change address command failed (%ld)", ret); + return ret; + } + kfree_skb(skb); + + return 0; +} + #define QCA_DFU_PACKET_LEN 4096 #define QCA_GET_TARGET_VERSION 0x09 @@ -3428,7 +3454,8 @@ struct qca_version { } __packed; struct qca_rampatch_version { - __le16 rom_version; + __le16 rom_version_high; + __le16 rom_version_low; __le16 patch_version; } __packed;How does this work. The struct now has an extra 16-bit in the middle. Is this backwards compatible?
bytes.
@@ -3440,12 +3467,14 @@ struct qca_device_info { }; static const struct qca_device_info qca_devices_table[] = { - { 0x00000100, 20, 4, 10 }, /* Rome 1.0 */ - { 0x00000101, 20, 4, 10 }, /* Rome 1.1 */ - { 0x00000200, 28, 4, 18 }, /* Rome 2.0 */ - { 0x00000201, 28, 4, 18 }, /* Rome 2.1 */ - { 0x00000300, 28, 4, 18 }, /* Rome 3.0 */ - { 0x00000302, 28, 4, 18 }, /* Rome 3.2 */ + { 0x00000100, 20, 4, 8 }, /* Rome 1.0 */ + { 0x00000101, 20, 4, 8 }, /* Rome 1.1 */Align it with 8 }
OK.
+ { 0x00000200, 28, 4, 16 }, /* Rome 2.0 */ + { 0x00000201, 28, 4, 16 }, /* Rome 2.1 */ + { 0x00000300, 28, 4, 16 }, /* Rome 3.0 */ + { 0x00000302, 28, 4, 16 }, /* Rome 3.2 */ + { 0x00130100, 40, 4, 16 }, /* WCN6855 1.0 */ + { 0x00130200, 40, 4, 16 } /* WCN6855 2.0 */And the last one should also be },
OK.
};static int btusb_qca_send_vendor_req(struct usb_device *udev, u8 request, @@ -3547,8 +3576,8 @@ static int btusb_setup_qca_load_rampatch(struct hci_dev *hdev,{ struct qca_rampatch_version *rver; const struct firmware *fw; - u32 ver_rom, ver_patch; - u16 rver_rom, rver_patch; + u32 ver_rom, ver_patch, rver_rom; + u16 rver_rom_low, rver_rom_high, rver_patch; char fwname[64]; int err;@@ -3567,9 +3596,16 @@ static int btusb_setup_qca_load_rampatch(struct hci_dev *hdev,bt_dev_info(hdev, "using rampatch file: %s", fwname); rver = (struct qca_rampatch_version *)(fw->data + info->ver_offset); - rver_rom = le16_to_cpu(rver->rom_version); + rver_rom_low = le16_to_cpu(rver->rom_version_low); rver_patch = le16_to_cpu(rver->patch_version); + if (ver_rom & ~0xffffU) { + rver_rom_high = le16_to_cpu(rver->rom_version_high); + rver_rom = le32_to_cpu(rver_rom_high << 16 | rver_rom_low); + } else { + rver_rom = rver_rom_low; + } + bt_dev_info(hdev, "QCA: patch rome 0x%x build 0x%x, " "firmware rome 0x%x build 0x%x", rver_rom, rver_patch, ver_rom, ver_patch); @@ -3643,9 +3679,6 @@ static int btusb_setup_qca(struct hci_dev *hdev) return err; ver_rom = le32_to_cpu(ver.rom_version); - /* Don't care about high ROM versions */ - if (ver_rom & ~0xffffU) - return 0; for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(qca_devices_table); i++) { if (ver_rom == qca_devices_table[i].rom_version)@@ -4081,6 +4114,13 @@ static int btusb_probe(struct usb_interface *intf,btusb_check_needs_reset_resume(intf); } + if (id->driver_info & BTUSB_QCA_WCN6855) { + data->setup_on_usb = btusb_setup_qca; + hdev->set_bdaddr = btusb_set_bdaddr_wcn6855; + hdev->cmd_timeout = btusb_qca_cmd_timeout; + set_bit(HCI_QUIRK_SIMULTANEOUS_DISCOVERY, &hdev->quirks); + } + if (id->driver_info & BTUSB_AMP) { /* AMP controllers do not support SCO packets */ data->isoc = NULL;Regards Marcel
