Hi Luiz, Thanks for the clarification. Please do ignore this patch then. On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 4:05 PM Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.dentz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Sonny, > > On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 3:43 PM Sonny Sasaka <sonnysasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Dear BlueZ maintainers, > > > > I saw recent patches that BlueZ started adding SPDX license tags to > > file headers. Is this where the convention is going? If so, please > > ignore this patch. > > Yes, it is better that way so we don't have to keep up with the > license on every file and will probably attempt do some automation to > check if SDPX Identifier is proper. > > > On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 5:28 PM Sonny Sasaka <sonnysasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > BlueZ does not use SPDX license tag on file headers. > > > > > > --- > > > .checkpatch.conf | 1 + > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > > > > diff --git a/.checkpatch.conf b/.checkpatch.conf > > > index 419733832..72c3529c3 100644 > > > --- a/.checkpatch.conf > > > +++ b/.checkpatch.conf > > > @@ -12,3 +12,4 @@ > > > --ignore PREFER_PACKED > > > --ignore COMMIT_MESSAGE > > > --ignore SSCANF_TO_KSTRTO > > > +--ignore SPDX_LICENSE_TAG > > > -- > > > 2.26.2 > > > > > > > -- > Luiz Augusto von Dentz
