Hi Miao,
On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 3:18 PM Miao-chen Chou <mcchou@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Luiz,
>
> For 0001-adapter-Do-not-remove-client-watch-directly-if-disco.patch,
> it looks good to me.
> For 0002-adapter-Consolitate-code-for-discovery-reply.patch, please
> see me following comments.
>
> +static void discovery_reply(struct watch_client *client, uint8_t status)
> +{
> + DBusMessage *reply;
> +
> + if (!client->msg)
> + return;
> +
> + if (!status) {
> It'd better to change this to "if (status == MGMT_STATUS_SUCCESS) {".
> + g_dbus_send_reply(dbus_conn, client->msg, DBUS_TYPE_INVALID);
> + } else {
> + reply = btd_error_busy(client->msg);
> + g_dbus_send_message(dbus_conn, reply);
> + }
> +
> + dbus_message_unref(client->msg);
> + client->msg = NULL;
> +}
> I also notice that we treated the status other than
> MGMT_STATUS_SUCCESS to be busy, but this can be addressed as a
> separate patch.
Wasn't that the error we were generating before? Afaik both start and
stop discovery were doing the same in this regard.
> For 0003-adapter-Fix-possible-crash-when-stopping-discovery.patch, I
> had few comments here.
> (1) I didn't see the corresponding changes to pass the pointer of the
> adapter as the user data when sending MGMT_OP_STOP_DISCOVERY command.
> Should it be part of the patch?
Yep, it should be fixed now.
> (2) This does resolve the crashing due to use-after-free of a
> watch_client. However, the following logic doesn't seem to be correct
> to me. If you recall the call path that we discussed, which is
> "client1 start_discovery() -> client1 start_discovery_complete() ->
> client1 stop_discovery() -> client2 start_discovery() -> client1
> detach from D-Bus which triggers discovery_disconnect() -> client1
> stop_discovery_complete() -> crash)",
> when client2 starts the discovery, client2 is added to
> adapter->discovery_list, so once stop_discovery_complete() is called
> with client1, client2 is the only client in adapter->discovery_list.
> And this statement remains true even with this patch. That being said,
> the following "client = adapter->discovery_list->data" would return
> client2, which is not supposed to be replied by
> stop_discovery_complete() issued by client1. Agree?
Yep, that will need tracking of the client who initiated the
operation, I will send a patch for that later today.
> + if (!adapter->discovery_list)
> + return;
> +
> + client = adapter->discovery_list->data;
>
> Thanks,
> Miao
>
> On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 2:25 PM Von Dentz, Luiz <luiz.von.dentz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 6:11 PM Von Dentz, Luiz <luiz.von.dentz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Miao,
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 6:03 PM Miao-chen Chou <mcchou@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> This properly handles the unref of client->msg in
> > >> stop_discovery_complete() and the reset of it. This also handles the unref
> > >> of client->msg, the reset of client->watch and the reset of client->msg in
> > >> start_discovery_complete().
> > >>
> > >> The following test was performed:
> > >> (1) Intentionally changed the MGMT status other than MGMT_STATUS_SUCCESS
> > >> in stop_discovery_complete() and start_discovery_complete() and built
> > >> bluetoothd.
> > >> (2) In bluetoothctl console, issued scan on/scan off to invoke
> > >> StartDiscovery and verified that new discovery requests can be processed.
> > >>
> > >> Reviewed-by: Alain Michaud <alainm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >> Reviewed-by: Sonny Sasaka <sonnysasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >> ---
> > >>
> > >> src/adapter.c | 5 +++++
> > >> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> > >>
> > >> diff --git a/src/adapter.c b/src/adapter.c
> > >> index 76acfea70..0857a3115 100644
> > >> --- a/src/adapter.c
> > >> +++ b/src/adapter.c
> > >> @@ -1652,6 +1652,9 @@ fail:
> > >> reply = btd_error_busy(client->msg);
> > >> g_dbus_send_message(dbus_conn, reply);
> > >> g_dbus_remove_watch(dbus_conn, client->watch);
> > >
> > >
> > > We shouldn't be removing the watch directly since the client may have registered filters so we let discovery_remove do it by calling discovery_free if necessary.
> > >
> > >>
> > >> + client->watch = 0;
> > >> + dbus_message_unref(client->msg);
> > >> + client->msg = NULL;
> > >> discovery_remove(client, false);
> > >> return;
> > >> }
> > >> @@ -1926,6 +1929,8 @@ static void stop_discovery_complete(uint8_t status, uint16_t length,
> > >> if (client->msg) {
> > >> reply = btd_error_busy(client->msg);
> > >> g_dbus_send_message(dbus_conn, reply);
> > >> + dbus_message_unref(client->msg);
> > >> + client->msg = NULL;
> > >> }
> > >> goto done;
> > >> }
> > >> --
> > >> 2.26.2
> > >
> > >
> > > Ive sent similar fixes upstream, let me attach them here just in case.
> >
> > Any comments on these changes, I would like to push them as soon as possible.
