Re: [PATCH 2/4] Bluetooth: Fix assuming EIR flags can result in SSP authentication

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Marcel and Luiz,

Starting with the 2.1 specification, it is my interpretation that it
is not valid to support EIR but not SSP.  I understand that SSP may be
disabled from BlueZ's point of view, but this doesn't seem to be a
legitimate/qualifiable configuration.  Should we instead fail the
legacy pairing if EIR was received as an invalid condition?

Thanks,
Alain

On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 10:35 AM Marcel Holtmann <marcel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Luiz,
>
> > EIR flags should just hint if SSP may be supported but we shall verify
> > this with use of the actual features as the SSP bits may be disabled in
> > the lower layers which would result in legacy authentication to be
> > used.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > net/bluetooth/hci_conn.c | 2 --
> > 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> patch has been applied to bluetooth-next tree.
>
> Regards
>
> Marcel
>



[Index of Archives]     [Bluez Devel]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Linux Wireless Personal Area Networking]     [Linux ATH6KL]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media Drivers]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Big List of Linux Books]

  Powered by Linux