Hi Luiz, >>> On Wed, 2020-05-06 at 13:24 +0200, Marcel Holtmann wrote: >>>> I have a little bit concern splitting this since battery service and >>>> HoG are kinda connected. Wouldn’t it be better we have a cleaner >>>> interface. Maybe we should actually integrate cleanly with >>>> /dev/upower or similar. >>> >>> Wat? >> >> I guess Marcel was refering to something like uhid though Im not sure >> that exists, or does it? That said one alternative would make uhid >> integrate the battery status, but I guess devices can also expose this >> over hid directly so I wonder if we can translate the Battery Service >> status to hid power strength that way we don't need any communication >> over D-Bus. > > Btw, Im fine with the option to disable building the battery plugin > since platforms may not have a use for it, so except if there are some > strong reason against it I will apply the patch. lets wait and see if we can actually generalize this feature. Regards Marcel
