Any more feedback on this Api design?
On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 10:51 AM Alain Michaud <alainmichaud@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 10:42 AM Szymon Janc <szymon.janc@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thursday, 23 April 2020 16:23:05 CEST Alain Michaud wrote:
> > > This change adds a new property to indicate the support for concurrent
> > > roles which means that the controller has reported the appropriate
> > > LE_Supported_States (hdev->le_states) and that the controller's driver
> > > has reported correctly handling the various reported states.
> > > ---
> > >
> > > doc/adapter-api.txt | 8 ++++++++
> > > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/doc/adapter-api.txt b/doc/adapter-api.txt
> > > index acae032d9..1a7255750 100644
> > > --- a/doc/adapter-api.txt
> > > +++ b/doc/adapter-api.txt
> > > @@ -326,3 +326,11 @@ Properties string Address [readonly]
> > >
> > > Local Device ID information in modalias format
> > > used by the kernel and udev.
> > > +
> > > + array{string} Roles [readonly]
> > > +
> > > + List of supported roles. Possible values:
> > > + "central": Supports the central role.
> > > + "peripheral": Supports the peripheral
> > role.
> > > + "central-peripheral": Supports both
> > roles
> > > +
> > concurrently.
> >
> > If this is an array os strings why central-peripheral is needed?
> The keyword in the description is "concurrently". Not all adapters
> support being peripheral and central concurrently.
>
> >
> >
> > --
> > pozdrawiam
> > Szymon Janc
> >
> >
