On 01/15, Gix, Brian wrote: > > Now, this raw value is used in send_seg, passed to > > mesh_crypto_packet_build, which effectively applies a 24bit mask in line > > 640: > > Yes, we should definitely be sanity checking this, and not sending if > SeqNum out of range. Ok, we'll do that then. > I think if we are repeatedly crashing, and it is causing a runaway > sequence number increase, that being forbidden to send more packets is > a natural consequence, and people should fix the code that was causing > the crash in the first place. You don't say. But it's not a given that the code is in the daemon itself. Two words: OOM killer. -- Michał Lowas-Rzechonek <michal.lowas-rzechonek@xxxxxxxxxxx> Silvair http://silvair.com Jasnogórska 44, 31-358 Krakow, POLAND
