Re: [PATCH BlueZ] shared/mainloop: Use connect() instead of bind() for sd_notify

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Guillem,

On Sat, 2019-12-14 at 10:40 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> We are the client, so we should be using connect(2) instead of
> bind(2),
> otherwise when using non-abstract Unix sockets we will get an error
> that
> the address is already in use.
> 
> This breaks the notify support in dpkg's start-stop-daemon.
> ---
>  src/shared/mainloop-notify.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/src/shared/mainloop-notify.c b/src/shared/mainloop-
> notify.c
> index 89a880006..1de714a0e 100644
> --- a/src/shared/mainloop-notify.c
> +++ b/src/shared/mainloop-notify.c
> @@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ void mainloop_notify_init(void)
>  	if (addr.sun_path[0] == '@')
>  		addr.sun_path[0] = '\0';
>  
> -	if (bind(notify_fd, (struct sockaddr *) &addr, sizeof(addr)) <
> 0) {
> +	if (connect(notify_fd, (struct sockaddr *) &addr, sizeof(addr))
> < 0) {
>  		close(notify_fd);
>  		notify_fd = -1;
>  		return;

Applied, thanks.




[Index of Archives]     [Bluez Devel]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Linux Wireless Personal Area Networking]     [Linux ATH6KL]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media Drivers]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Big List of Linux Books]

  Powered by Linux