Brian,
On 09/05, Gix, Brian wrote:
> > if (net->iv_upd_state == IV_UPD_INIT) {
> > - if (iv_index > net->iv_index)
> > + if (iv_index > net->iv_index + 1)
> > mesh_net_set_seq_num(net, 0);
>
> I think you have found something, but I think we are missing something here...
>
> If iv_index > net->iv_index, and iv_update == false, then we still
> want to reset to Seq Zero, I think...Even if the increase is just 1.
Indeed. Let me re-test both scenarios and I'll get back to you with v2.
> So perhaps:
> if (iv_index > net->iv_index && !iv_update)
> mesh_net_set_seq_num(net, 0);
> else if (iv_index > net->iv_index + 2)
> mesh_net_set_seq_num(net, 0);
>
> Or more esoterically (and maybe harder to follow):
> if (iv_index > net->iv_index + iv_update)
> mesh_net_set_seq_num(net, 0);
>
> Or something like that.
Yeah, that looks reasonable.
--
Michał Lowas-Rzechonek <michal.lowas-rzechonek@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Silvair http://silvair.com
Jasnogórska 44, 31-358 Krakow, POLAND
