Re: [PATCH] Fast Advertising Interval

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Spoorthi,

> Changes made to add support for fast advertising interval
> as per core 4.1 specification, section 9.3.11.2.
> 
> A peripheral device entering any of the following GAP modes and
> sending either non-connectable advertising events or scannable
> undirected advertising events should use adv_fast_interval2
> (100ms - 150ms) for adv_fast_period(30s).
> 
>         - Non-Discoverable Mode
>         - Non-Connectable Mode
>         - Limited Discoverable Mode
>         - General Discoverable Mode
> 
> Signed-off-by: Spoorthi Ravishankar Koppad <spoorthix.k@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h |  2 ++
> net/bluetooth/hci_request.c      | 25 +++++++++++++++++--------
> 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h b/include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h
> index 7dfe6ff..a69534d 100644
> --- a/include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h
> +++ b/include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h
> @@ -1512,6 +1512,8 @@ struct hci_mgmt_chan {
> #define DISCOV_INTERLEAVED_INQUIRY_LEN	0x04
> #define DISCOV_BREDR_INQUIRY_LEN	0x08
> #define DISCOV_LE_RESTART_DELAY		msecs_to_jiffies(200)	/* msec */
> +#define DISCOV_LE_FAST_ADV_INT_MIN     100     /* msec */
> +#define DISCOV_LE_FAST_ADV_INT_MAX     150     /* msec */
> 
> void mgmt_fill_version_info(void *ver);
> int mgmt_new_settings(struct hci_dev *hdev);
> diff --git a/net/bluetooth/hci_request.c b/net/bluetooth/hci_request.c
> index d4ecf71..6d8ffcc 100644
> --- a/net/bluetooth/hci_request.c
> +++ b/net/bluetooth/hci_request.c
> @@ -1199,15 +1199,24 @@ void __hci_req_enable_advertising(struct hci_request *req)
> 		return;
> 
> 	memset(&cp, 0, sizeof(cp));
> -	cp.min_interval = cpu_to_le16(hdev->le_adv_min_interval);
> -	cp.max_interval = cpu_to_le16(hdev->le_adv_max_interval);
> -
> -	if (connectable)
> +	if (connectable) {
> 		cp.type = LE_ADV_IND;
> -	else if (get_cur_adv_instance_scan_rsp_len(hdev))
> -		cp.type = LE_ADV_SCAN_IND;
> -	else
> -		cp.type = LE_ADV_NONCONN_IND;
> +		cp.min_interval = cpu_to_le16(hdev->le_adv_min_interval);
> +		cp.max_interval = cpu_to_le16(hdev->le_adv_max_interval);
> +	} else {
> +		if (get_cur_adv_instance_scan_rsp_len(hdev))
> +			cp.type = LE_ADV_SCAN_IND;
> +		else
> +			cp.type = LE_ADV_NONCONN_IND;
> +
> +		if (!hci_dev_test_flag(hdev, HCI_DISCOVERABLE) ||
> +		    hci_dev_test_flag(hdev, HCI_LIMITED_DISCOVERABLE)) {
> +			cp.min_interval =
> +				cpu_to_le16(DISCOV_LE_FAST_ADV_INT_MIN);
> +			cp.max_interval =
> +				cpu_to_le16(DISCOV_LE_FAST_ADV_INT_MAX);
> +		}

isn’t this missing an else clause?

> +	}
> 
> 	cp.own_address_type = own_addr_type;
> 	cp.channel_map = hdev->le_adv_channel_map;

I would move this block up right after the memset().

Regards

Marcel




[Index of Archives]     [Bluez Devel]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Linux Wireless Personal Area Networking]     [Linux ATH6KL]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media Drivers]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Big List of Linux Books]

  Powered by Linux