On Sat, Feb 02, 2019 at 01:15:16PM +0100, Marcel Holtmann wrote:
> Hi Myungho,
>
> > tty_set_termios() should be called with slave side of pty driver. So, If
> > tty driver is pty master, it needs to be switched to ->link.
> >
> > Reported-by: syzbot+a950165cbb86bdd023a4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Signed-off-by: Myungho Jung <mhjungk@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/bluetooth/hci_ldisc.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> > 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_ldisc.c b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_ldisc.c
> > index fbf7b4df23ab..0f6e70ea1dc3 100644
> > --- a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_ldisc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_ldisc.c
> > @@ -299,10 +299,21 @@ static int hci_uart_send_frame(struct hci_dev *hdev, struct sk_buff *skb)
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > +/* If pty master, return slave side */
> > +static struct tty_struct *hci_uart_get_real_tty(struct tty_struct *tty)
> > +{
> > + if (tty->driver->type == TTY_DRIVER_TYPE_PTY &&
> > + tty->driver->subtype == PTY_TYPE_MASTER)
> > + tty->link;
> > +
> > + return tty;
> > +}
> > +
> > /* Flow control or un-flow control the device */
> > void hci_uart_set_flow_control(struct hci_uart *hu, bool enable)
> > {
> > struct tty_struct *tty = hu->tty;
> > + struct tty_struct *real_tty;
> > struct ktermios ktermios;
> > int status;
> > unsigned int set = 0;
> > @@ -314,11 +325,14 @@ void hci_uart_set_flow_control(struct hci_uart *hu, bool enable)
> > return;
> > }
> >
> > + /* termios should be set from slave side if tty driver is pty */
> > + real_tty = hci_uart_get_real_tty(tty);
> > +
> > if (enable) {
> > /* Disable hardware flow control */
> > - ktermios = tty->termios;
> > + ktermios = real_tty->termios;
> > ktermios.c_cflag &= ~CRTSCTS;
> > - status = tty_set_termios(tty, &ktermios);
> > + status = tty_set_termios(real_tty, &ktermios);
> > BT_DBG("Disabling hardware flow control: %s",
> > status ? "failed" : "success");
> >
> > @@ -350,9 +364,9 @@ void hci_uart_set_flow_control(struct hci_uart *hu, bool enable)
> > BT_DBG("Setting RTS: %s", status ? "failed" : "success");
> >
> > /* Re-enable hardware flow control */
> > - ktermios = tty->termios;
> > + ktermios = real_tty->termios;
> > ktermios.c_cflag |= CRTSCTS;
> > - status = tty_set_termios(tty, &ktermios);
> > + status = tty_set_termios(real_tty, &ktermios);
> > BT_DBG("Enabling hardware flow control: %s",
> > status ? "failed" : "success");
> > }
> > @@ -367,9 +381,12 @@ void hci_uart_set_speeds(struct hci_uart *hu, unsigned int init_speed,
> >
> > void hci_uart_set_baudrate(struct hci_uart *hu, unsigned int speed)
> > {
> > - struct tty_struct *tty = hu->tty;
> > + struct tty_struct *tty;
> > struct ktermios ktermios;
> >
> > + /* termios should be set from slave side if tty driver is pty */
> > + tty = hci_uart_get_real_tty(hu->tty);
> > +
>
> didn’t we conclude that allowing the HCI line discipline on a PTY master isn't worth the effort? The ptm_unix98_ops doesn’t have the .set_termios and thus, just check that ops->set_termios is present in hci_uart_tty_open and if not fail with EOPNOTSUPP like we do for missing ops->write.
>
> Regards
>
> Marcel
>
Hi Marcel,
I thought there might be some cases that reach here even returning error in
hci_uart_tty_open(). Let me fix it from hci_uart_tty_open.
Thanks,
Myungho
