Re: [PATCH v4 05/13] Bluetooth: Handle extended ADV PDU types

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Marcel,

On Sat, Jul 14, 2018 at 10:58 PM, Marcel Holtmann <marcel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Jaganath,
>
>> This patch defines the extended ADV types and handle it in ADV report.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jaganath Kanakkassery <jaganathx.kanakkassery@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> include/net/bluetooth/hci.h |  8 ++++++++
>> net/bluetooth/hci_event.c   | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
>> 2 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/net/bluetooth/hci.h b/include/net/bluetooth/hci.h
>> index 3584632..fcd1d57 100644
>> --- a/include/net/bluetooth/hci.h
>> +++ b/include/net/bluetooth/hci.h
>> @@ -1977,6 +1977,14 @@ struct hci_ev_le_conn_complete {
>> #define LE_LEGACY_SCAN_RSP_ADV                0x001b
>> #define LE_LEGACY_SCAN_RSP_ADV_SCAN   0x001a
>>
>> +/* Extended Advertising event types */
>> +#define LE_EXT_ADV_NON_CONN_IND              0x0000
>> +#define LE_EXT_ADV_CONN_IND          0x0001
>> +#define LE_EXT_ADV_SCAN_IND          0x0002
>> +#define LE_EXT_ADV_DIRECT_IND                0x0004
>> +#define LE_EXT_ADV_SCAN_RSP          0x0008
>> +#define LE_EXT_ADV_LEGACY_PDU                0x0010
>> +
>> #define ADDR_LE_DEV_PUBLIC    0x00
>> #define ADDR_LE_DEV_RANDOM    0x01
>>
>> diff --git a/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c b/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c
>> index 6942315..027abe6 100644
>> --- a/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c
>> +++ b/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c
>> @@ -5137,20 +5137,39 @@ static void hci_le_adv_report_evt(struct hci_dev *hdev, struct sk_buff *skb)
>>       hci_dev_unlock(hdev);
>> }
>>
>> -static u8 convert_legacy_evt_type(u16 evt_type)
>> -{
>> -     switch (evt_type) {
>> -     case LE_LEGACY_ADV_IND:
>> -             return LE_ADV_IND;
>> -     case LE_LEGACY_ADV_DIRECT_IND:
>> -             return LE_ADV_DIRECT_IND;
>> -     case LE_LEGACY_ADV_SCAN_IND:
>> -             return LE_ADV_SCAN_IND;
>> -     case LE_LEGACY_NONCONN_IND:
>> -             return LE_ADV_NONCONN_IND;
>> -     case LE_LEGACY_SCAN_RSP_ADV:
>> -     case LE_LEGACY_SCAN_RSP_ADV_SCAN:
>> -             return LE_ADV_SCAN_RSP;
>> +static u8 convert_ext_evt_type(u16 evt_type)
>> +{
>> +     if (evt_type & LE_EXT_ADV_LEGACY_PDU) {
>> +             switch (evt_type) {
>> +             case LE_LEGACY_ADV_IND:
>> +                     return LE_ADV_IND;
>> +             case LE_LEGACY_ADV_DIRECT_IND:
>> +                     return LE_ADV_DIRECT_IND;
>> +             case LE_LEGACY_ADV_SCAN_IND:
>> +                     return LE_ADV_SCAN_IND;
>> +             case LE_LEGACY_NONCONN_IND:
>> +                     return LE_ADV_NONCONN_IND;
>> +             case LE_LEGACY_SCAN_RSP_ADV:
>> +             case LE_LEGACY_SCAN_RSP_ADV_SCAN:
>> +                     return LE_ADV_SCAN_RSP;
>> +             }
>
> I would do a return here since only the legacy part is special.
>
>> +     } else {
>> +             if (evt_type & LE_EXT_ADV_CONN_IND) {
>> +                     if (evt_type & LE_EXT_ADV_DIRECT_IND)
>> +                             return LE_ADV_DIRECT_IND;
>> +
>> +                     return LE_ADV_IND;
>> +             }
>> +
>> +             if (evt_type & LE_EXT_ADV_SCAN_RSP)
>> +                     return LE_ADV_SCAN_RSP;
>> +
>> +             if (evt_type & LE_EXT_ADV_SCAN_IND)
>> +                     return LE_ADV_SCAN_IND;
>> +
>> +             if (evt_type == LE_EXT_ADV_NON_CONN_IND ||
>> +                 evt_type & LE_EXT_ADV_DIRECT_IND)
>> +                     return LE_ADV_NONCONN_IND;
>
> Why do we have one == match here and the rest are bit checks.
>
>>       }
>>
>>       BT_ERR_RATELIMITED("Unknown advertising packet type: 0x%02x",
>> @@ -5172,7 +5191,7 @@ static void hci_le_ext_adv_report_evt(struct hci_dev *hdev, struct sk_buff *skb)
>>               u16 evt_type;
>>
>>               evt_type = __le16_to_cpu(ev->evt_type);
>> -             legacy_evt_type = convert_legacy_evt_type(evt_type);
>> +             legacy_evt_type = convert_ext_evt_type(evt_type);
>
> So ext_evt_type_to_legacy might be a better function name here.
>
>>               if (legacy_evt_type != LE_ADV_INVALID) {
>
> I might have asked this before, when are we reaching _INVALID here?
>

It will be hit in case of an unknown advertising pkt type.

Thanks,
Jaganath
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Bluez Devel]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Linux Wireless Personal Area Networking]     [Linux ATH6KL]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media Drivers]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Big List of Linux Books]

  Powered by Linux