Hi Balakrishna,
On 25 April 2018 at 14:16, <bgodavar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Thank you for adding me to loop, is the header size of RAM patch file
> remains same for ROME < 3.2 and ROME >= 3.2, what about the header format,
> do we have same header format for different ROME versions, even mismatch of
> header will not break any execution, but it may show wrong data in kernel
> logs.
Yes, at least in my case, we just use byte 7 which was previously 'reserved':
struct edl_event_hdr {
@@ -94,7 +102,8 @@ struct tlv_type_patch {
__le32 data_length;
__u8 format_version;
__u8 signature;
- __le16 reserved1;
+ __u8 download_mode;
+ __u8 reserved1;
__le16 product_id;
__le16 rom_build;
__le16 patch_version;
Regards,
Loic
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
