Hi Jaganath, On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 5:40 AM, Jaganath K <jaganath.k.os@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Marcel, > > > On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 12:22 PM, Jaganath Kanakkassery > <jaganath.k.os@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> This also adds PHY Configuration Changed Event. >> --- >> doc/mgmt-api.txt | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 52 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/doc/mgmt-api.txt b/doc/mgmt-api.txt >> index c07c48c..628ff18 100644 >> --- a/doc/mgmt-api.txt >> +++ b/doc/mgmt-api.txt >> @@ -2940,9 +2940,46 @@ Get PHY Configuration Command >> LE 1M TX and LE 1M RX would be supported by default. >> >> This command is only available for LE capable controllers. >> + It will return Not Supported otherwise. >> + >> + Possible errors: Not Supported >> + Invalid Index >> + >> +Set PHY Configuration Command >> +============================= >> + >> + Command Code: 0x0044 >> + Controller Index: <controller id> >> + Command Parameters: Default_phys (2 Octet) >> + Return Parameters: >> + >> + This command is used to set the default phy to the controller. >> + >> + This will be stored and used for all the subsequent scanning >> + and connection initiation. >> + >> + The list of supported PHYs can be retrieved via the >> + Get PHY Configuration command. Selecting unsupported PHYs will >> + result in an Invalid Parameters error. >> + >> + This can be called at any point to change the preferred PHYs. >> + >> + Default_phy is a bitmask with the following bits. >> + 0 LE 1M TX >> + 1 LE 1M RX >> + 2 LE 2M TX >> + 3 LE 2M RX >> + 4 LE CODED TX >> + 5 LE CODED RX >> + >> + This command generates a Command Complete event on success >> + or a Command Status event on failure. >> + >> + This command is only available for LE capable controllers. >> It will return Not Supported otherwise. >> >> Possible errors: Not Supported >> + Invalid Parameters >> Invalid Index >> > > I think there is a limitation with current API proposal, user cannot do extended > scanning in only 1M (to scan secondary channel in 1M) since with 1M we will > switch to legacy scanning. Why do we have to switch to legacy scanning for 1M? It seems it would be possible to use extended scanning whenever it is supported regardless of the PHY, or perhaps the spec imposes limitations to certain PHYs? Coded perhaps? > I think we need two more flags eg: 1MTX-SEC & 1MRX-SEC, if set we will > use extended scanning in !M. > > Plz let me know your opinion. > > Thanks, > Jaganath > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- Luiz Augusto von Dentz -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
