Re: Overhead reduction in LE connection establishment

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Jamie,

>>For the application’s purpose, it’s critical that the notification is recieved with the minimum latency.
>
> Is there any reason why you wish to have the button in a disconnected state when inactive over having it in a connected state but with a high connection interval and a large slave latency? A high slave latency means it can stay in sleep mode if there is nothing to report back to the central device for a specified number of packets so is perfect for battery powered devices.

The only reason is: very high expectations of battery life. I recall
we played with the slave latency in the past, but we will reevaluate
and see if it's a feasible option. Thanks for the suggestion.

Regardless, I am still curious to know if disconnecting and sending
the notification right away (as Luiz suggests) isn't racy with respect
to StartNotify().
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Bluez Devel]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Linux Wireless Personal Area Networking]     [Linux ATH6KL]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media Drivers]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Big List of Linux Books]

  Powered by Linux