Hi Luiz (and linux-bluetooth),
On Wed, 2017-09-20 at 12:52 +0300, Luiz Augusto von Dentz wrote:
/From: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@xxxxxxxxx>/
//
/If there are more than one node connected and there isn't any route/
/information attempt to check if destination address matches any of/
/the/
/link-local peer addresses./
//
/Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@xxxxxxxxx>/
/---/
/net/bluetooth/6lowpan.c | 2 +-/
/1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)/
//
/diff --git a/net/bluetooth/6lowpan.c b/net/bluetooth/6lowpan.c/
/index 4e2576fc0c59..55370c330386 100644/
/--- a/net/bluetooth/6lowpan.c/
/+++ b/net/bluetooth/6lowpan.c/
/@@ -190,7 +190,7 @@ static inline struct lowpan_peer/
/*peer_lookup_dst(struct lowpan_btle_dev *dev,/
/nexthop = &lowpan_cb(skb)->gw;/
//
/if (ipv6_addr_any(nexthop))/
/- return NULL;/
/+ nexthop = daddr;/
/} else {/
/nexthop = rt6_nexthop(rt, daddr);/
//
Was there any plan to bring this into the longterm 4.14 tree? I saw
that Jukka ACKed the patch.
Using 4.14, connecting more than 1 node via 6lowpan is completely
broken. This fairly simple patch restores connectivity for multiple
6lowpan devices.
Question: Are there any hidden downsides to using this patch?
- Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
