Hi, On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 12:23:57PM +0200, Sebastian Reichel wrote: > On Sun, Jul 23, 2017 at 09:32:23AM +0200, Marcel Holtmann wrote: > > >>>> The Nokia devices require the setup of its Public Bluetooth Device > > >>>> Address and for that it is required to depend on vendor specific > > >>>> commands. For Broadcom based Nokia devices, that is part of btbcm > > >>>> module and can be selected via BT_BCM config option. > > >>>> > > >>>> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > >>> > > >>> Reviewed-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > >> > > >> btw. we need to also provide the set_bdaddr for TI chips. > > > > > > The TI based chip in Nokia N950 has a proper address configured, so > > > it works without set_bdaddr (it would still be nice of course). It > > > also seems to be missing for hci_ll, though. So the required command > > > is completly unknown? > > > > are these a TI address or a Nokia address? I doubt Nokia would > > have actually shipped any hardware using an IEEE assigned address > > to TI. > > I can check this later. The BD address on my N950 starts with B4:EE:D4, which belongs to TI as far as I can see. Note, that N950 is a developer only device. -- Sebastian
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature