On Fri, 2017-04-07 at 13:48 -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 12:09 PM, Dan Williams <dcbw@xxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > On Fri, 2017-04-07 at 09:35 -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > > > Turns out that the LL protocol and the TI-ST are the same thing > > > AFAICT. > > > The TI-ST adds firmware loading, GPIO control, and shared access > > > for > > > NFC, FM radio, etc. For now, we're only implementing what is > > > needed > > > for > > > BT. This mirrors other drivers like BCM and Intel, but uses the > > > new > > > serdev bus. > > > > > > The firmware loading is greatly simplified by using existing > > > infrastructure to send commands. It may be a bit slower than the > > > original code using synchronous functions, but the real > > > bottleneck is > > > likely doing firmware load at 115.2kbps. > > > > Is there no way to put the TI-specific stuff into a TI UART module > > rather than building it into the generic one? > > In case it's not clear, all of HCI_LL is the TI specific part, not > just what I'm adding. So you are talking about putting each UART BT > protocol into a separate module. I'd assume that is doable, but seems > orthogonal to this patch set. I'd also assume there was some reason > that was not done already. Ok, thanks for the explanation. Wasn't clear at all from the file paths in the source tree; it looked generic. Dan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
