You're right. As discussed on a separate thread with Jakub, instead of two filters we might want to add one unique filter "nameRegexp" that would take a regular expression to filter against bluetooth device names. What do you think? On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 9:40 AM Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.dentz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi François, > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 2:09 PM, François Beaufort > <beaufort.francois@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > The SetDiscoveryFilter method already has UUIDs, RSSI, Pathloss and > > Transport filters. > > I was wondering if it would be possible to add "name" and "namePrefix" > > filters to this list? > > > > I'm shamelessly asking this because the Web Bluetooth API has added > > these filters: http://webbluetoothcg.github.io/web-bluetooth/#dictdef-bluetoothscanfilter > > I guess we can extend with more filters but Im afraid having 2 filters > like that can be confusing, what if name and prefix are set? Shall it > can an error? What should be the logic AND or OR operation? I guess > like with the other we need a merge strategy if multiple clients set a > filter with different names. > > > > -- > Luiz Augusto von Dentz -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
