Hello Alex, First of all, I want to thank you for changes that you have done on 6LoWPAN architecture. Due to a large workload we have not been able to do further patches to the Stateful Compression RFC. We would be more than happy if you want to continue on what we started. While we are busy in next few weeks with other priorities, we should still be able to make time for reviews if you want to take over where we left. One note I would like to add is from the latest BTLE draft: (https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-6lo-btle-17#section-3.2.4). This defines some different (non generic) approach with respect to compression of IID, that comes from ARO messages (not implemented in Linux) instead of MAC layer, which is not handled by the initial Stateful Compression RFC we proposed. Best regards, Łukasz > -----Original Message----- > From: Alexander Aring [mailto:alex.aring@xxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Monday, October 12, 2015 18:16 > To: Duda, Lukasz > Cc: linux-wpan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-bluetooth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > martin.gergeleit@xxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [RFC v2 0/4] Adding stateful compression to IPHC > > Hi Lukasz, > > do you still working on sateful compression, otherwise I would try to > implement this stuff based on your work. > > When I have something I will keep you in cc for reviewing process. > > Thanks. > > - Alex ��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{��� �^n�r������&��z�ޗ�zf���h���~����������_��+v���)ߣ�
