Hi, Atul Rai <a.rai@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > ping > I didn't get the original email. >> ------- Original Message ------- >> Sender : Atul Kumar Rai<a.rai@xxxxxxxxxxx> Lead Engineer (1)/SRI-Delhi-SWC Group/Samsung Electronics >> Date : Jun 29, 2015 12:14 (GMT+05:30) >> Title : [PATCH] android/hal-bluetooth: Fix NULL ptr dereference >> >> Add NULL check on malloc return to fix NULL pointer dereference >> in case malloc fails. >> --- >> android/hal-bluetooth.c | 6 ++++++ >> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/android/hal-bluetooth.c b/android/hal-bluetooth.c >> index e24f7d2..66f4a37 100644 >> --- a/android/hal-bluetooth.c >> +++ b/android/hal-bluetooth.c >> @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ >> #include <stdlib.h> >> #include <stdbool.h> >> #include <string.h> >> +#include <errno.h> >> >> #include <cutils/properties.h> >> >> @@ -1103,6 +1104,11 @@ static int open_bluetooth(const struct hw_module_t *module, char const *name, >> >> DBG(""); >> >> + if (!dev) { >> + error("Failed to allocate memory for device"); >> + return -ENOMEM; >> + } >> + Looks OK. Just wondering why it is not using calloc() instead of 'malloc() + sizeof()'. Cheers, -- Vinicius -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html