Hi Fabio, -----Original Message----- From: Fabio Estevam [mailto:festevam@xxxxxxxxx] Sent: Friday, June 19, 2015 3:23 PM To: Ilya Faenson Cc: Marcel Holtmann; linux-bluetooth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Arend Van Spriel Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] Broadcom Bluetooth UART Device Tree bindings On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 6:30 PM, Ilya Faenson <ifaenson@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > +Optional properties: > + > + - bt-host-wake-gpios : bt-host-wake input GPIO to be used as an interrupt. > + > + - bt-wake-gpios : bt-wake output GPIO to be used to suspend / resume device. > + > + - bt-reg-on-gpios : reg-on output GPIO to be used to power device on/off. Shouldn't this be modelled as a regulator instead? What if the board drives a PMIC output to provide power to the BT interface? IF: I think the regulator would indeed be a better name for the "GPIO set" idea I mentioned in a separate message to Rob Herring. :-) ��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{��� �
