On 17/06/15 04:52, Ben Young Tae Kim wrote: > Hi Sumit, > > On 06/15/15 10:48, Sumit's Mailing Lists wrote: >> On 16/06/15 00:57, Ben Young Tae Kim wrote: >>> Hi Sumit, >>> >>> >>> On 06/15/15 07:16, Sumit's Mailing Lists wrote: >>>> On 15/06/15 21:55, Marcel Holtmann wrote: >>>>> Hi Smuit, >>>>> >>>>>>>> I'm currently using an MSI WS60 laptop which contains the following >>>>>>>> Bluetooth controller (from lsusb): >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Bus 003 Device 003: ID 0cf3:3004 Atheros Communications, Inc. AR3012 >>>>>>>> Bluetooth 4.0 >>>>>>> assuming that the firmware is present, this is most likely just missing the right VID/PID additions in the drivers. Please prepare a patch for that. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> and the more detailed version: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Bus 003 Device 003: ID 0cf3:3004 Atheros Communications, Inc. AR3012 >>>>>>>> Bluetooth 4.0 >>>>>>>> Device Descriptor: >>>>>>>> bLength 18 >>>>>>>> bDescriptorType 1 >>>>>>>> bcdUSB 1.10 >>>>>>>> bDeviceClass 224 Wireless >>>>>>>> bDeviceSubClass 1 Radio Frequency >>>>>>>> bDeviceProtocol 1 Bluetooth >>>>>>>> bMaxPacketSize0 64 >>>>>>>> idVendor 0x0cf3 Atheros Communications, Inc. >>>>>>>> idProduct 0x3004 AR3012 Bluetooth 4.0 >>>>>>>> bcdDevice 0.01 >>>>>>>> iManufacturer 0 >>>>>>>> iProduct 0 >>>>>>>> iSerial 0 >>>>>>>> bNumConfigurations 1 >>>>>>>> Configuration Descriptor: >>>>>>> I actually prefer /sys/kernel/debug/usb/devices output for the devices. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Marcel >>>>>>> >>>>>> Here is the output from /sys/kernel/debug/usb/devices for my ath3k (also >>>>>> added it to the kernel bugzilla): >>>>>> >>>>>> T: Bus=03 Lev=02 Prnt=02 Port=02 Cnt=01 Dev#= 3 Spd=12 MxCh= 0 >>>>>> D: Ver= 1.10 Cls=e0(wlcon) Sub=01 Prot=01 MxPS=64 #Cfgs= 1 >>>>>> P: Vendor=0cf3 ProdID=3004 Rev= 0.01 >>>>>> C:* #Ifs= 2 Cfg#= 1 Atr=e0 MxPwr=100mA >>>>>> I:* If#= 0 Alt= 0 #EPs= 3 Cls=e0(wlcon) Sub=01 Prot=01 Driver=(none) >>>>>> E: Ad=81(I) Atr=03(Int.) MxPS= 16 Ivl=1ms >>>>>> E: Ad=82(I) Atr=02(Bulk) MxPS= 64 Ivl=0ms >>>>>> E: Ad=02(O) Atr=02(Bulk) MxPS= 64 Ivl=0ms >>>>>> I:* If#= 1 Alt= 0 #EPs= 2 Cls=e0(wlcon) Sub=01 Prot=01 Driver=(none) >>>>>> E: Ad=83(I) Atr=01(Isoc) MxPS= 0 Ivl=1ms >>>>>> E: Ad=03(O) Atr=01(Isoc) MxPS= 0 Ivl=1ms >>>>>> I: If#= 1 Alt= 1 #EPs= 2 Cls=e0(wlcon) Sub=01 Prot=01 Driver=(none) >>>>>> E: Ad=83(I) Atr=01(Isoc) MxPS= 9 Ivl=1ms >>>>>> E: Ad=03(O) Atr=01(Isoc) MxPS= 9 Ivl=1ms >>>>>> I: If#= 1 Alt= 2 #EPs= 2 Cls=e0(wlcon) Sub=01 Prot=01 Driver=(none) >>>>>> E: Ad=83(I) Atr=01(Isoc) MxPS= 17 Ivl=1ms >>>>>> E: Ad=03(O) Atr=01(Isoc) MxPS= 17 Ivl=1ms >>>>>> I: If#= 1 Alt= 3 #EPs= 2 Cls=e0(wlcon) Sub=01 Prot=01 Driver=(none) >>>>>> E: Ad=83(I) Atr=01(Isoc) MxPS= 25 Ivl=1ms >>>>>> E: Ad=03(O) Atr=01(Isoc) MxPS= 25 Ivl=1ms >>>>>> I: If#= 1 Alt= 4 #EPs= 2 Cls=e0(wlcon) Sub=01 Prot=01 Driver=(none) >>>>>> E: Ad=83(I) Atr=01(Isoc) MxPS= 33 Ivl=1ms >>>>>> E: Ad=03(O) Atr=01(Isoc) MxPS= 33 Ivl=1ms >>>>>> I: If#= 1 Alt= 5 #EPs= 2 Cls=e0(wlcon) Sub=01 Prot=01 Driver=(none) >>>>>> E: Ad=83(I) Atr=01(Isoc) MxPS= 49 Ivl=1ms >>>>>> E: Ad=03(O) Atr=01(Isoc) MxPS= 49 Ivl=1ms >>>>>> >>>>>> and the firmware the kernel is trying to load: >>>>>> >>>>>> [ 762.729370] usb 3-1.3: Direct firmware load for >>>>>> ar3k/AthrBT_0x00000200.dfu failed with error -2 >>>>>> [ 762.729373] Bluetooth: Patch file not found ar3k/AthrBT_0x00000200.dfu >>>>>> [ 762.729374] Bluetooth: Loading patch file failed >>>>>> [ 762.729381] ath3k: probe of 3-1.3:1.0 failed with error -2 >>>>>> [ 762.729411] usbcore: registered new interface driver ath3k >>>>> I fail to see that firmware in linux-firmware tree. However this up to Atheros / Qualcomm to submit there. I can not do much about this. >>>>> >>>>> Regards >>>>> >>>>> Marcel >>>>> >>>> Marcel, >>>> >>>> So it's pulling the right firmware file for my device, but It just >>>> hasn't been released yet? >>>> >>>> I know with the Wi-Fi firmware, the ath10k devs had python scripts to >>>> extract the firmware binaries from the Windows drivers (mentioned in >>>> here https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1383184). Has >>>> anyone done that before with the bluetooth firmware, or do you typically >>>> just wait for atheros/qualcom to release official ones? >>> Where did you get your atheros board/card since I couldn't find that board here. Is it a laptop? The BT firmware driver was trying to load AthrBT_0x00000200.dfu file and it got failed because no firmware file was present. But 0x00000200 means fw_version.rom_version which coming from controller chip, however, I haven't seen this version on Atheros chipset. >>> >>> I'm adding my friend - Rick Huang here. He may help you out >>> >>> Hi Rick, >>> >>> Have you seen rom_version as 0x00000200? >>> >>>> Sumit >>>> -- >>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in >>>> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >>> Thanks >>> -- Ben Kim >>> >> Yes, It's an MSI WS-60 Laptop, purchased two months ago in Australia. Is >> there any other debugging information I need to pull for you? >> >> Sumit >> -- >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in >> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > According to my colleague, it is not AR chip but QCA ROME core inside even though they're sharing same VID/PID with AR/QCA ROME(version 2). That's why you cannot bring up your card with ath3k driver. I knew it was not a good idea as it was early stage to develop the card so that next version of ROME USB card(v3.0 or v3.2) will use different PID/VID as you can see below. > > Can you follow up these instructions to see whether or not it can be addressed on your setup? > > -- > 1. put this code in drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c > > static const struct usb_device_id blacklist_table[] = { > ... > /* QCA ROME chipset */ > { USB_DEVICE(0x0cf3, 0xe300), .driver_info = BTUSB_QCA_ROME }, > { USB_DEVICE(0x0cf3, 0xe360), .driver_info = BTUSB_QCA_ROME }, > { USB_DEVICE(0x0cf3, 0x3004), .driver_info = BTUSB_QCA_ROME }, // <-- add new VID/PID here > ... > > 2. Copy firmware files into /lib/firmware/qca > - nvm_usb_00000200.bin > - rampatch_usb_00000200.bin > Those FW files won't be available on linux-firmware.git til today but it it will be available soon I believe. > -- > > Thanks > -- Ben Kim > > > Hi Ben, I added that line to my btusb.c; did a mrpropery, copied my .config back into the source tree, disabled ATH3K in menucofnig, made the bzImage and rebooted. The firmware you attached is in /lib/firmware/qca. I enabled debugging (FLAGS_btusb.o := -DDEBUG in the Makefile) so I could get some more info, and discovered I also have to delete this line or it will match the ath first: { USB_DEVICE(0x0cf3, 0x3004), .driver_info = BTUSB_ATH3012 } So then I saw [ 1.263991] usb 3-1.3: new full-speed USB device number 3 using ehci-pci [ 1.277022] usb 4-1.8: new full-speed USB device number 3 using ehci-pci [ 1.350050] usb 3-1.3: New USB device found, idVendor=0cf3, idProduct=3004 [ 1.350051] usb 3-1.3: New USB device strings: Mfr=0, Product=0, SerialNumber=0 [ 1.350461] intf ffff88041bf62400 id ffffffff81d83bc0 [ 1.350462] BT Device Info 0 [ 1.350463] BT Device Info (after matching) 32768 [ 1.350466] In Rome Block [ 1.350546] input: ETPS/2 Elantech Touchpad as /devices/platform/i8042/serio1/input/input10 [ 1.350671] hci0 [ 1.350879] Bluetooth: hci0: don't support firmware rome 0x200 [ 1.364795] usb 4-1.8: New USB device found, idVendor=1770, idProduct=ff00 [ 1.364797] usb 4-1.8: New USB device strings: Mfr=1, Product=1, SerialNumber=1 [ 1.364798] usb 4-1.8: Product: MSI EPF USB [ 1.364799] usb 4-1.8: Manufacturer: MSI EPF USB [ 1.364800] usb 4-1.8: SerialNumber: MSI EPF USB So those BT Device Info statements I added in the probe function. "In Rome Block" I added right after "if (id->driver_info & BTUSB_QCA_ROME) " and you can see where that error comes from. And that comes from...oh it checks another table...okay so I added the following to qca_device_info { 0x00000200, 28, 4, 18 }, and now I get; [ 1.357942] intf ffff88041ba5bc00 id ffffffff81d83bc0 [ 1.357943] BT Device Info 0 [ 1.357944] BT Device Info (after matching) 32768 [ 1.357946] In Rome Block [ 1.358113] hci0 [ 1.358516] bluetooth hci0: Direct firmware load for qca/rampatch_usb_00000200.bin failed with error -2 [ 1.358517] Bluetooth: hci0: failed to request rampatch file: qca/rampatch_usb_00000200.bin (-2) So progress. It's attempting to load the firmware and failing. Are those the right numbers for the device_info block? Sumit -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html