Hi, Marcel
On Thu, 2015-05-21 at 11:24 +0900, Chan-yeol Park wrote:
> The previous commit(3267c88) missed QCA61x4 ROME v2.0 info on Samsung
> so its BT is not activated and the below message is shown.
>
> [ 8.009638] usb 1-1: New USB device found, idVendor=0cf3,
> idProduct=e300
> [ 8.012637] usb 1-1: New USB device strings: Mfr=0, Product=0,
> SerialNumber=0
> [ 8.102901] Bluetooth: hci0: don't support firmware rome 0x200
>
> This patch adds QCA61x4 ROME v2.0 info in qca_devices_table[], and is
> verified on Samsung with the firmware provided by Kim, Ben Young Tae
> <ytkim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>.
>
> T: Bus=01 Lev=01 Prnt=01 Port=00 Cnt=01 Dev#= 2 Spd=12 MxCh= 0
> D: Ver= 1.10 Cls=e0(wlcon) Sub=01 Prot=01 MxPS=64 #Cfgs= 1
> P: Vendor=0cf3 ProdID=e300 Rev= 0.01
> C:* #Ifs= 2 Cfg#= 1 Atr=e0 MxPwr=100mA
> I:* If#= 0 Alt= 0 #EPs= 3 Cls=e0(wlcon) Sub=01 Prot=01 Driver=btusb
> E: Ad=81(I) Atr=03(Int.) MxPS= 16 Ivl=1ms
> E: Ad=82(I) Atr=02(Bulk) MxPS= 64 Ivl=0ms
> E: Ad=02(O) Atr=02(Bulk) MxPS= 64 Ivl=0ms
> I:* If#= 1 Alt= 0 #EPs= 2 Cls=e0(wlcon) Sub=01 Prot=01 Driver=btusb
> E: Ad=83(I) Atr=01(Isoc) MxPS= 0 Ivl=1ms
> E: Ad=03(O) Atr=01(Isoc) MxPS= 0 Ivl=1ms
> I: If#= 1 Alt= 1 #EPs= 2 Cls=e0(wlcon) Sub=01 Prot=01 Driver=btusb
> E: Ad=83(I) Atr=01(Isoc) MxPS= 9 Ivl=1ms
> E: Ad=03(O) Atr=01(Isoc) MxPS= 9 Ivl=1ms
> I: If#= 1 Alt= 2 #EPs= 2 Cls=e0(wlcon) Sub=01 Prot=01 Driver=btusb
> E: Ad=83(I) Atr=01(Isoc) MxPS= 17 Ivl=1ms
> E: Ad=03(O) Atr=01(Isoc) MxPS= 17 Ivl=1ms
> I: If#= 1 Alt= 3 #EPs= 2 Cls=e0(wlcon) Sub=01 Prot=01 Driver=btusb
> E: Ad=83(I) Atr=01(Isoc) MxPS= 25 Ivl=1ms
> E: Ad=03(O) Atr=01(Isoc) MxPS= 25 Ivl=1ms
> I: If#= 1 Alt= 4 #EPs= 2 Cls=e0(wlcon) Sub=01 Prot=01 Driver=btusb
> E: Ad=83(I) Atr=01(Isoc) MxPS= 33 Ivl=1ms
> E: Ad=03(O) Atr=01(Isoc) MxPS= 33 Ivl=1ms
> I: If#= 1 Alt= 5 #EPs= 2 Cls=e0(wlcon) Sub=01 Prot=01 Driver=btusb
> E: Ad=83(I) Atr=01(Isoc) MxPS= 49 Ivl=1ms
> E: Ad=03(O) Atr=01(Isoc) MxPS= 49 Ivl=1ms
>
> Signed-off-by: Chan-yeol Park <chanyeol.park@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c b/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c
> index b9f2821..c334620 100644
> --- a/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c
> +++ b/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c
> @@ -2382,6 +2382,7 @@ struct qca_device_info {
> static const struct qca_device_info qca_devices_table[] = {
> { 0x00000100, 20, 4, 10 }, /* Rome 1.0 */
> { 0x00000101, 20, 4, 10 }, /* Rome 1.1 */
> + { 0x00000200, 28, 4, 18 }, /* Rome 2.0 */
> { 0x00000201, 28, 4, 18 }, /* Rome 2.1 */
> { 0x00000300, 28, 4, 18 }, /* Rome 3.0 */
> { 0x00000302, 28, 4, 18 }, /* Rome 3.2 */
I also verified this with fedora 22 on Samsung laptop today. Kindly
could you review this? I would like to use the Bluetooth with upstream Kernel on my machine :).
Thanks
Chanyeol
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
