Hi Chan-yeol, On 05/20/15 05:44, Chan-yeol Park wrote: > Hi Marcel, > > On 05/20/2015 09:35 PM, Chan-yeol Park wrote: >> Hi Marcel, >> On 05/20/2015 03:21 AM, Marcel Holtmann wrote: >>> >>> Hi Chan-yeol, >>>> >>>> The previous commit(3267c88) regressed QCA61x4 BT on Samsung because its device info is missed in qca_devices_table[], so btusb_open() return error unexpectedly. >>> >>> how does this regress. We never had QCA module support in the first place. The patch looks good, I was just wondering what the regression will be here? >> My environment was virtual box on windows. >> I guess windows download QC firmware successfully, so without firmware handling in the linux I could use bluetooth adapter. >> I didn't realize ROME v2.0 was out to the market. Where did you get this module? Does it built-in on your laptop? Your patch looks good, however, I need your confirmation that it will work on your board since I don't have ROME v2.0 HW. I'll send you ROME v2.0 FW files for you and will upstream it to linux-firmware.git if it works. >> Until now , I fail to find the exact firmware , "qca/rampatch_usb_*.bin" for QCA61x4. >> I just saw the mail that Kyle McMartin reject firmware patches made by Ben Young Tae Kim. >> Could you tell where I can get it? >> >> Actually my wifi QCA61x4 does not work well.. QCA61x4 WiFi will use 'ATH10k' driver. Did you enable this module compiled on your kernel tree? >> > I am sending this mail again because previous mail is not sent to bluetooth-next due to HTML format. > > Thanks > Chanyeol > Thanks -- Ben Kim -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html