Hi Florian, On Sun, May 17, 2015, Florian Grandel wrote: > Hi Marcel and Johan, > > here is what I did so far: > > - I asked you whether contributions from newcomers are welcome (which Marcel > agreed to), > > - I coordinated the development target and approach with Marcel to make sure > that my contribution will be generally useful and acceptable, > > - I read lots of documentation to make sure that I'm asking as few redundant > questions as possible, > > - I invested a considerable amount of time to put a useful contribution > together, > > - Arman invested a considerable amount of time to review it, > > - I again invested a considerable amount of time to work in all review > comments. > > - I waited for several weeks and pinged you several times to get you to do > your part as maintainers... > > What am I missing?? Did I overlook your response? Or is this the "normal" > Kernel community approach? No need to get worried or frustrated about your set. It hasn't been forgotten about and it hasn't lost the chance to get included in the first possible kernel release, i.e. 4.2. It'll very likely go into a bluetooth-next pull request before the 4.2 merge window opens. For my part I have no major objections after reading it through a couple of times - I remember Marcel saying he'd take a look after Arman's review, which is what I've mostly be waiting for. But in no case has your set been forgotten. Johan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
