Re: [PATCH] tools/btmgmt: Introduce stop-find command

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 8:04 PM, Arman Uguray <armansito@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Jakub,
>
>> On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 7:11 PM, Jakub Pawlowski <jpawlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> This patch adds stop-find command that stops discovery started by
>> find, or find-service command.
>> ---
>>  tools/btmgmt.c | 79 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 79 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/btmgmt.c b/tools/btmgmt.c
>> index 8eff56b..89c2f43 100644
>> --- a/tools/btmgmt.c
>> +++ b/tools/btmgmt.c
>> @@ -1897,6 +1897,84 @@ static void cmd_find(struct mgmt *mgmt, uint16_t index, int argc, char **argv)
>>         }
>>  }
>>
>> +static void stop_find_rsp(uint8_t status, uint16_t len, const void *param,
>> +                                                       void *user_data)
>> +{
>> +       if (status != 0) {
>> +               fprintf(stderr,
>> +                       "Unable to stop discovery. status 0x%02x (%s)\n",
>> +                                               status, mgmt_errstr(status));
>
> You should stay consistent with other error messages, I would format
> this as "Stop Discovery failed: status 0x%02x (%s)\n" (note the ':'
> after "Stop Discovery failed").
>
ok, I'll fix that
>> +               mainloop_quit();
>> +               return;
>> +       }
>> +
>> +       printf("Discovery stopped\n");
>> +       discovery = false;
>> +
>> +       noninteractive_quit(EXIT_SUCCESS);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void stop_find_usage(void)
>> +{
>> +       printf("Usage: btmgmt stop-find [-l|-b]>\n");
>> +}
>> +
>> +static struct option stop_find_options[] = {
>> +       { "help",       0, 0, 'h' },
>> +       { "le-only",    1, 0, 'l' },
>> +       { "bredr-only", 1, 0, 'b' },
>> +       { 0, 0, 0, 0 }
>> +};
>> +
>> +static void cmd_stop_find(struct mgmt *mgmt, uint16_t index, int argc,
>> +                         char **argv)
>> +{
>> +       struct mgmt_cp_stop_discovery cp;
>> +       uint8_t type;
>> +       int opt;
>> +
>> +       if (index == MGMT_INDEX_NONE)
>> +               index = 0;
>> +
>> +       type = 0;
>> +       type |= (1 << BDADDR_BREDR);
>> +       type |= (1 << BDADDR_LE_PUBLIC);
>> +       type |= (1 << BDADDR_LE_RANDOM);
>> +
>> +       while ((opt = getopt_long(argc, argv, "+lbh", stop_find_options,
>> +                                                               NULL)) != -1) {
>
> What happens if I pass "-b -l" or "-l -b"? The behavior is not very
> well defined.
>
>> +               switch (opt) {
>> +               case 'l':
>> +                       type &= ~(1 << BDADDR_BREDR);
>> +                       type |= (1 << BDADDR_LE_PUBLIC);
>> +                       type |= (1 << BDADDR_LE_RANDOM);
>
> You've already or'd LE_PUBLIC and LE_RANDOM before entering the loop,
> why do this again?
>
>> +                       break;
>> +               case 'b':
>> +                       type |= (1 << BDADDR_BREDR);
>
> Same, you've already or'd BREDR before the loop, so why is this line
> needed? Also, if these shifted values are frequently used, can we just
> define constants for them? I see that you mostly stayed consistent
> with cmd_find and cmd_find_service, but perhaps the address type can
> be calculated in a helper since this code is repeated.

Can I just stay consistent with cmd_find and cmd_find_service, and
I'll refactor that in next patch ?

>
>> +                       type &= ~(1 << BDADDR_LE_PUBLIC);
>> +                       type &= ~(1 << BDADDR_LE_RANDOM);
>> +                       break;
>> +               case 'h':
>> +               default:
>> +                       stop_find_usage();
>> +                       exit(EXIT_SUCCESS);
>> +               }
>> +       }
>> +
>> +       argc -= optind;
>> +       argv += optind;
>> +       optind = 0;
>> +
>> +       memset(&cp, 0, sizeof(cp));
>> +       cp.type = type;
>> +
>> +       if (mgmt_send(mgmt, MGMT_OP_STOP_DISCOVERY, index, sizeof(cp), &cp,
>> +                                            stop_find_rsp, NULL, NULL) == 0) {
>> +               fprintf(stderr, "Unable to send stop_discovery cmd\n");
>> +               exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
>> +       }
>> +}
>> +
>>  static void name_rsp(uint8_t status, uint16_t len, const void *param,
>>                                                         void *user_data)
>>  {
>> @@ -3268,6 +3346,7 @@ static struct cmd_info all_cmd[] = {
>>         { "con",        cmd_con,        "List connections"              },
>>         { "find",       cmd_find,       "Discover nearby devices"       },
>>         { "find-service", cmd_find_service, "Discover nearby service"   },
>> +       { "stop-find",  cmd_stop_find,  "Stop discovery"                },
>>         { "name",       cmd_name,       "Set local name"                },
>>         { "pair",       cmd_pair,       "Pair with a remote device"     },
>>         { "cancelpair", cmd_cancel_pair,"Cancel pairing"                },
>> --
>> 2.2.0.rc0.207.ga3a616c
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
> Thanks,
> Arman
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Bluez Devel]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Linux Wireless Personal Area Networking]     [Linux ATH6KL]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media Drivers]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Big List of Linux Books]

  Powered by Linux