Hi Luiz,
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015, Luiz Augusto von Dentz wrote:
> +#define DATA_10B 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff
> +
> +#define DATA_100B DATA_10B, DATA_10B, DATA_10B, DATA_10B, DATA_10B, \
> + DATA_10B, DATA_10B, DATA_10B, DATA_10B, DATA_10B
> +
> +#define DATA_511B DATA_100B, DATA_100B, DATA_100B, DATA_100B, DATA_100B, \
> + DATA_10B, 0xff
> +
> +#define DATA_512B DATA_511B, 0xff
> +
> +#define DATA_4KB DATA_512B, DATA_512B, DATA_512B, DATA_512B, DATA_512B, \
> + DATA_512B, DATA_512B, DATA_512B
> +
> +#define DATA_16KB DATA_4KB, DATA_4KB, DATA_4KB, DATA_4KB
> +
> +#define DATA_64KB DATA_16KB, DATA_16KB, DATA_16KB, DATA_16KB
> +
> +/* 64KB + 383B */
> +static const uint8_t long_data_2[] = { DATA_64KB, DATA_100B, DATA_100B,
> + DATA_100B, DATA_10B, DATA_10B, DATA_10B,
> + DATA_10B, DATA_10B, DATA_10B, DATA_10B,
> + DATA_10B, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff };
Instead of all these complex defines wouldn't it be easier to just:
static const uint8_t long_data_2[0xffff + 383];
The only difference is that you'd have zeros instead of 0xff bytes as
content.
Johan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
