Hi Andrei, On Tue, Oct 28, 2014, Andrei Emeltchenko wrote: > Initialize variable at declaration fixing setting it to the same value > many times. > --- > src/shared/gatt-helpers.c | 20 +++++--------------- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/src/shared/gatt-helpers.c b/src/shared/gatt-helpers.c > index 4f53de3..5713924 100644 > --- a/src/shared/gatt-helpers.c > +++ b/src/shared/gatt-helpers.c > @@ -974,7 +974,7 @@ static void discover_included_cb(uint8_t opcode, const void *pdu, > uint8_t att_ecode = 0; > uint16_t last_handle; > size_t data_length; > - bool success; > + bool success = false; > > if (opcode == BT_ATT_OP_ERROR_RSP) { > att_ecode = process_error(pdu, length); > @@ -983,14 +983,11 @@ static void discover_included_cb(uint8_t opcode, const void *pdu, > op->result_head) > goto done; > > - success = false; > goto failed; > } We generally try to avoid variable initializations upon declaration to keep it clear what value is expected and where as well as make it easy to spot unused variables. So I'm not really convinced of this patch. Johan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html