Hi Martin,
On to, 2014-10-02 at 13:16 +0100, Martin Townsend wrote:
> Hi Jukka,
>
> Thanks for investigating this.
>
> If you set the dev in your receive function does the oops go away, BTW this is where the pkt_type is set to PACKET_HOST, for us this was causing problems, I don't know if this is the same for you guys.
>
> Here's the code:
>
> local_skb->protocol = htons(ETH_P_IPV6);
> >>> local_skb->dev = dev;
> local_skb->pkt_type = PACKET_HOST;
>
> if (give_skb_to_upper(local_skb, dev)
> != NET_RX_SUCCESS) {
> kfree_skb(local_skb);
>
> - Martin.
So I applied this patch
diff --git a/net/bluetooth/6lowpan.c b/net/bluetooth/6lowpan.c
index e4f5ce5..aa64f91 100644
--- a/net/bluetooth/6lowpan.c
+++ b/net/bluetooth/6lowpan.c
@@ -323,6 +323,7 @@ static int recv_pkt(struct sk_buff *skb, struct
net_device *dev,
local_skb->protocol = htons(ETH_P_IPV6);
local_skb->pkt_type = PACKET_HOST;
+ local_skb->dev = dev;
if (give_skb_to_upper(local_skb, dev) != NET_RX_SUCCESS)
{
goto drop_local_skb;
@@ -362,6 +363,7 @@ static int recv_pkt(struct sk_buff *skb, struct
net_device *dev,
local_skb->protocol = htons(ETH_P_IPV6);
local_skb->pkt_type = PACKET_HOST;
+ local_skb->dev = dev;
if (give_skb_to_upper(local_skb, dev)
!=
NET_RX_SUCCESS) {
and I do not see the earlier null pointer oops any more.
Unfortunately a new error is seen:
[ 340.676353] inconsistent {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} -> {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} usage.
[ 340.676353] kworker/u3:1/370 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1] takes:
[ 340.676353] (&(&list->lock)->rlock#6){+.?...}, at: [<f8319d4c>]
hci_send_acl+0xac/0x290 [bluetooth]
[ 340.676353] {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} state was registered at:
[ 340.676353] [<c10915a3>] __lock_acquire+0x6d3/0x1d20
[ 340.676353] [<c109325d>] lock_acquire+0x9d/0x140
[ 340.676353] [<c1889c25>] _raw_spin_lock+0x45/0x80
[ 340.676353] [<f8319d4c>] hci_send_acl+0xac/0x290 [bluetooth]
[ 340.676353] [<f833abf0>] l2cap_do_send+0x60/0x100 [bluetooth]
[ 340.676353] [<f833e7c0>] l2cap_chan_send+0x7f0/0x10e0 [bluetooth]
[ 340.676353] [<f850691e>] send_pkt+0x4e/0xa0 [bluetooth_6lowpan]
[ 340.676353] [<f8506d20>] bt_xmit+0x3b0/0x770 [bluetooth_6lowpan]
[ 340.676353] [<c17742f4>] dev_hard_start_xmit+0x344/0x670
[ 340.676353] [<c17749ad>] __dev_queue_xmit+0x38d/0x680
[ 340.676353] [<c1774caf>] dev_queue_xmit+0xf/0x20
[ 340.676353] [<c177b8b0>] neigh_connected_output+0x130/0x1a0
[ 340.676353] [<c1812a63>] ip6_finish_output2+0x173/0x8c0
[ 340.676353] [<c18182db>] ip6_finish_output+0x7b/0x1b0
[ 340.676353] [<c18184a7>] ip6_output+0x97/0x2a0
...
I have to investigate this more what your new code is doing as I did not
see this error earlier before your patch.
So I have very latest bluetooth-next (commit b57d4471fd18) + your v4
patch + above patch that sets the dev pointer, and this combination
triggers the above inconsistent softirq usage error.
Cheers,
Jukka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
