On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 01:53:57PM +0200, Alexander Aring wrote: > On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 01:47:59PM +0200, Alexander Aring wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 12:39:11PM +0100, Martin Townsend wrote: > > > Hi Alex, > > > On 16/09/14 12:36, Alexander Aring wrote: > > > > On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 12:01:59PM +0100, Martin Townsend wrote: > ... > > > > and this also smells like side effects for me, because we have the > > local_skb which is sometimes freed inside of lowpan_process_data and > > returning skb. Then we don't know which we should kfree_skb now, the skb > > or local_skb now. Need to thing more about this to offer some solution, > > somebody agree here with me? > > > > I mean sometimes we do this *skb = *new and skb is the parameter and before we > did a consume_skb(skb); then local_skb is already freed after this and > returning an errno and we make kfree_skb(local_skb) will crash something, > I suppose. I meant skb = new for the expand skb thing. And we can't never free kfree_skb(skb) here if (IS_ERR(skb) is true, but we can't decide if we need a kfree_skb(local_skb) or not, because we do a consume_skb($SKB_FROM_PARAMTER) in lowpan_process_data. - Alex -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
