Hi Arman,
>>> struct bt_att {
>>> int ref_count;
>>> int fd;
>>> - bool close_on_unref;
>>
>> I like to keep the close_on_unref logic. So please do not remove it.
>>
>
> I removed this flag in favor of directly calling
> io_set_close_on_destroy in bt_att_set_close_on_unref, which achieves
> the same thing. Is it better to have a separate flag and not use
> io_set_close_on_destroy at all?
good question. I have no idea. If the feature is still there, then I do not care either way. However such a change might be better done in a separate patch.
Regards
Marcel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
