Later on in lowpan_process_data and in a another function IIRC the skb could potentially be copy expanded as we are uncompressing which results in a new skb. - Martin. On 01/08/14 16:45, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote: > On 08/01/2014 05:30 PM, Martin Townsend wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Martin Townsend <martin.townsend@xxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> include/net/6lowpan.h | 2 +- >> net/6lowpan/iphc.c | 22 +++++++++++++--------- >> net/bluetooth/6lowpan.c | 12 ++++++++---- >> net/ieee802154/6lowpan_rtnl.c | 12 ++++++------ >> 4 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/include/net/6lowpan.h b/include/net/6lowpan.h >> index d7e9169..aa0381e 100644 >> --- a/include/net/6lowpan.h >> +++ b/include/net/6lowpan.h >> @@ -374,7 +374,7 @@ lowpan_uncompress_size(const struct sk_buff *skb, u16 *dgram_offset) >> >> typedef int (*skb_delivery_cb)(struct sk_buff *skb); >> >> -int lowpan_process_data(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev, >> +int lowpan_process_data(struct sk_buff **skb_inout, struct net_device *dev, > Why do you make the first parameter a double pointer? > > Marc > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
