Hi Arman, On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 7:45 AM, Arman Uguray <armansito@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > This patch set introduces "struct bt_att" which handles the transport logic for > interactions over the Attribute Protocol. struct bt_att is meant to be > connection-agnostic: It enables a new GATT/ATT stack based around src/shared/io, > so that the library internals of how the connection is managed (glib vs > mainloop) is not tied to the protocol implementation. bt_att will initially > support the client-side protocol and eventually extended to support the server > side. > > Major changes introduced in this patch-set: > - src/shared/att.[h,cc], which introduces "struct bt_att", with initial > support for client-initiated requests and asynchronous response handling via > a callback. > - unit/test-att, which defines unit tests for request/response using a > socketpair. > - tools/btatt, which is a command-line tool for debugging the Attribute > Protocol. > > The majority of the above are introduced in patches 1 through 3, which consist > almost entirely of boilerplate taken from src/shared/mgmt.*, unit/test-mgmt, and > tools/btmgmt.c. > > The 9 patches introduced here are the initial portion of 20+ patches where each > ATT operation is implemented in groups of 3 patches: > - 1 patch that implements the request/response or command in src/shared/att > - 1 patch that adds a unit test to unit/test-att > - 1 patch that adds a command for the request to tools/btatt > > Arman Uguray (10): > src/shared/att: Introduce struct bt_att. > unit/test-att: Add unit tests for src/shared/att. > tools/btatt: Add command-line tool for ATT protocol testing. > tools/btatt: Add "exchange-mtu" command. > src/shared/att: Add "Find Information" request and response. > unit/test-att: Add unit test for "Find Information" request/response. > tools/btatt: Add "find-information" command. > src/shared/att: Add "Find By Type Value" request and response. > unit/test-att: Add unit test for "Find By Type Value" > request/response. > tools/btatt: Add "find-by-type-value" command. > > Makefile.am | 12 +- > Makefile.tools | 10 +- > src/shared/att.c | 689 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > src/shared/att.h | 124 ++++++++++ > tools/btatt.c | 626 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > unit/test-att.c | 473 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 6 files changed, 1932 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 src/shared/att.c > create mode 100644 src/shared/att.h > create mode 100644 tools/btatt.c > create mode 100644 unit/test-att.c > > -- > 1.9.1.423.g4596e3a Apparently you have ignored my comments regarding the API, it is probably not the best thing to base everything on mgmt API since that is a internal protocol which does not need encoding as everything is passed in host order, also unlike mgmt you have GATT on top o ATT so it is beneficial to use iovec in the API. Regarding unit tests, I think you should take a look at test-av*, and there exists a test specification for ATT/GATT so we should start with it since is what PTS uses for qualification: https://www.bluetooth.org/docman/handlers/downloaddoc.ashx?doc_id=229871 You can use the name and description of the unit test following the test specification: /TP/GAC/CL/BV-01-C: Verify that a Generic Attribute Profile client can generate an Exchange MTU Request command to configure ATT_MTU over LE. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html