Re: [PATCH 1/2] core: don't set BR/EDR support when no flags present

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 12:25 AM, Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> One thing to note regarding this first one: this is actually not a
> problem with current bluetooth-next since there we merge the adv_ind and
> scan_rsp into a single mgmt device found event. I.e. with such a kernel
> we will not need to have this extra non-zero flags check. I added an
> extra code comment to this place so we don't forget to fix it.
>

Makes sense, we're testing with the current
bluetooth-next/for-upstream tag, and it looks like the
ADV_IND/SCAN_RSP merging patches aren't submitted yet ;-)

Won't this mean that the flag checking will be needed on kernels prior
to 3.15 in either case?

Scott
-- 
Have you ever, ever felt like this?
Had strange things happen?  Are you going round the twist?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Bluez Devel]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Linux Wireless Personal Area Networking]     [Linux ATH6KL]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media Drivers]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Big List of Linux Books]

  Powered by Linux