Hi Claudio, >>> This patchset implements the minimal support for adding local services >>> declarations. >>> >>> Limitation: Remove services and multiple services exported by the same >>> remote will be implemented the next series. >> >> what is the deal with this unix socket you are using for local access? I think we should remove that functionality and keep it simple in the beginning. > > Testing purpose only to avoid breaking the current attribute server. > The fact is, the current attribute server "architecture" is not > flexible enough to support external services properly. > The idea is to get rid of the "old" attribute server when we finish > the new implementation. > > Lizardo has some patches allowing compatibility between the two > versions. We will send new patchsets to remove the unix socket, and > introduce this compatibility. that sounds better. I rather not have an extra unix socket based API around. We are still having a heard time to get rid of the SDP unix socket. Regards Marcel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
