Hi Andrzej,
On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 7:16 AM, Andrzej Kaczmarek
<andrzej.kaczmarek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> +static void bond_create_pin_success_request_cb(bt_bdaddr_t *remote_bd_addr,
> + bt_bdname_t *bd_name, uint32_t cod)
> +{
> + struct test_data *data = tester_get_data();
> + struct mgmt_cp_pin_code_reply rp;
> + bdaddr_t remote_addr;
> + static uint8_t pair_device_pin[] = { 0x30, 0x30, 0x30, 0x30 };
> + const void *pin_code = pair_device_pin;
> + uint8_t pin_len = 4;
> +
> + memset(&rp, 0, sizeof(rp));
> +
> + data->cb_count--;
> +
> + android2bdaddr(remote_bd_addr, &remote_addr);
> +
> + bacpy(&rp.addr.bdaddr, &remote_addr);
> + rp.addr.type = BDADDR_BREDR;
> + rp.pin_len = pin_len;
> + memcpy(rp.pin_code, pin_code, rp.pin_len);
> +
> + mgmt_reply(data->mgmt, MGMT_OP_PIN_CODE_REPLY, data->mgmt_index,
> + sizeof(rp), &rp, NULL, NULL, NULL);
I wonder why you are sending mgmt commands directly instead of using
data->if_bluetooth->pin_reply()?
NOTE: I'm not very familiar with the HAL API so I may just be missing
the point of the test.
Best Regards,
--
Anderson Lizardo
http://www.indt.org/?lang=en
INdT - Manaus - Brazil
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
