SM: is BlueZ the Master/Initiator or Slave/Responder?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



We are able to pass all qualification tests with BlueZ as the Master except one:

  TP/KDU/BV-06-C - Master Key Distribution - Encryption Key bit

This test requires that BlueZ initiates pairing with the
SMP_DIST_ENC_KEY bit set in the init_key_dist member of struct
smp_cmd_pairing - however this member is always initialized to zero
and never changed.

This seems to have changed at some point in the past, 2b64d153 added
MITM mechanism and changed the init_key_dist member initialization
from dist_keys to 0


So two questions:

 1) should BlueZ be able to behave as Master? It passes the majority
of the tests except this one.

 2) given the above, is this a bug that init_key_dist is 0 or is it a
test plan error that it requires this?

Scott
-- 
Scott James Remnant | Chrome OS Systems | keybuk@xxxxxxxxxx | Google
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Bluez Devel]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Linux Wireless Personal Area Networking]     [Linux ATH6KL]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media Drivers]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Big List of Linux Books]

  Powered by Linux